| |
Backtalk
ETS! encourages comments, feedback, tips, corrections, and
info! Please keep them as concise as possible so we can
print as many different voices as possible: ETS!, P.O. Box
85541, Seattle WA 98145, or e-mail ets@scn.org.
Undesirable Tenants
ETS!,
Thank you so much for ETS! I have become so disgusted with the local
adpapers that occasionally (accidentally?) have news in them; yet I find
myself guilty of purchasing them in a futile attempt to obtain local
coverage. Your publication bridges a gap for me by focusing on the local
political issues that will directly affect my future. Since you have hit a
weekly 8-page format I am giving up both local newspapers, neither of which
adequately covered national, international, or local issues.
Speaking of which--in the Times a 4-12-97 letter to the editor addressed
the 11-hour standoff downtown with "The Swordsman." A sentiment that I have
heard more times than I care admit resurfaced: "Why didn't the police
unleash a hail of taxpayer-funded bullets?"
I am quite frankly disgusted that so many people feel the lives of
"undesirable tenants in the condominium of life" are so cheap that they
should be discarded for disrupting traffic and business. But, hey, he's a
homeless lunatic and I gotta get my haircut...
David Crispin, Seattle
Ed. reply: We don't cover local or global news adequately either!
The impact that ETS! has had--put together with no money by a handful of
volunteers in a few hours a week--simply underscores the desperate need, in
any and every city and town, for enterprises that treat news as a necessary
commodity rather than as mind candy and/or corporate ass-kissing fill
material between the ads.
Another ETS! reader suggested we run the Swordsman for mayor or city
council. We like the idea: here's a guy who's patient, has stamina,
determination, and focus, knows how to handle city officials and the
police, and people respond when he talks. Proven leadership and the
ability to babble incoherently in public for hours on end! It's a natural!
Not to mention it's the only conceivable way he'll get access to the health
care he probably needs.
Short Memories
ETS!,
Regarding stadiums: I hope that ETS! and other alternative media can make a
difference by refreshing the public memory at crucial and
strategic times like elections. It's nice to read about this stuff
now--it feels good to see things I agree with--but it needs to be followed
up at election times and other appropriate "I told you so" moments, where a
politician's past statements and actions can be resurrected for maximum
damaging effect.
As another example, anti-Pageler posters could mysteriously appear on
telephone poles all over the city, reminding people that she's the
Anti-Poster Lady (the caption!). A picture of her, caught mid-harangue,
with a flying ropelet of spittle in freeze-frame stasis, all done in false
color...
The IWW used to have a slogan, "We Never Forget!" Pity that's now obsolete,
superceded by "civility of public discourse."
--Kurt Cockrum, White Center WA
Huh?
ETS!,
I think that you have a great publication, and I think that you are doing
wonderful things, however a comment on your analyses of not paying taxes.
You failed to mention that those of us who don't pay our taxes are
decreasing the amount of money the government has, and the way they
will get more is to tax the non-super wealthy more, and make those who do pay taxes get a larger burden on themselves.
--Stephen C. Phillips, Seattle
Ed. reply: A more realistic model is that governments, like any other
institution, seek first of all to maintain and expand themselves. In the
example of tax policies for a corporate-dominated government, this means
the corporate state getting as much money as possible from, and spending as
little money as possible on, other parts of society; and, conversely,
taxing itself as lightly and enriching itself as much as politically
feasible.
Our non-super-wealthy, tax-paying friend is going to be taxed as highly as
possible, and get as little for it as possible, regardless of what you or I
do. "Never mind, we have enough money now" is not exactly the norm here.
More importantly, the argument of "If I don't do it [pay taxes, work for
Exxon, buy Chinese, torture prisoners], someone else will" is an argument
for powerlessness and cooperation with evil. The Gandhi quote comes to
mind: "Whatever it is you can do, it is most important that you do it."
Many folks simply aren't in a logistical, financial, or emotional place to
consider taking on the IRS and the risks involved with tax resistance. But-
-as with every other political act in our daily lives--there are risks to
be weighed and choices to be made, and the more consciously and
intentionally we make them, the better.
|