| |
Backtalk
ETS! encourages comments, feedback, tips, corrections, and
info! Please keep them as concise as possible so we can
print as many different voices as possible: ETS!, P.O. Box
85541, Seattle WA 98145, or e-mail ets@scn.org.
Just Remove the Whole Cancer Stick
Hey Geov:
You said (correctly I believe) that people start smoking because of the way young people get hit with two things: It's COOL (ie. Joe dick-head Camel) and It's FORBIDDEN (thanks to the law, government, parents, teachers, etc). Then they keep smoking becaus
e of the tobacco corporations' manipulation of ADDICTIVE substances within cigarettes.
Thus, I think the solutions are really quite simple:
1) Make it UnCool: End tobacco corporations' abilities to advertise in any
but the most boring way. Make them only able to provide basic information
without pictures or music and, of course, include prominent warnings.
Hmmm... why limit this advertising p olicy only to tobacco?
2) Make it UnForbidden: End legal restrictions for young people on
purchase of tobacco. Controversial? Yes, but we all know the fastest way
to make young people want something is to tell them they can't have it.
The new attitude is: "Sure you can smoke i f you want to. And here is some
information about what you'll be ingesting." Make that information as
graphic and grotesque as possible to match the grotesque taste they are
about to experience. Some young people will still try smoking, but much
fewer tha n when it is given the allure of the forbidden. I'm concerned
that this new blitz of anti-smoking campaigning will backfire and create
interest in smoking amongst young people. I also am concerned that tobacco
corporations' willingness to pay for such cam paigns reflects their
psychological savvy in how to market their product to young people. The
harder the anti-smoking campaigns try to say "don't," the more kids may
say "what am I missing?" For those kids that do try smoking, see the next
idea below.
3) Make it as Non-Addictive as possible: This means regulating the content
of tobacco in the strongest spirit of the FDA's mandate to protect the
public and their effort to define tobacco as a controlled substance. Make
tobacco companies pay for research to discover ingredients that would
counteract the addictive qualities. Require complete disclosure of all
ingredients, just like any other pharmacutical company has to comply with.
If it's possible to remove nicotine, then why not just remove it completel
y?
Solidarity,
--Scott Reed
There Once Was A Gay Named Enola...
ETS!,
Hoorah for the pirates of Seafair
And warplanes a-roaring aloft there
It's "all in good fun"
To rape, pillage and plun-
Der as long as it's women, NOT software!
--woosey@ccc.wa.com
Greedy Citizens Fear Social Safety Net
Relieved you wrote about Boeing-McDonnell Douglas merger. It's not size
(power) of this conglomerate as much as what McDonnell produces. Seattle
is now the biggest "war machine" producing city in USA. Sadly, Boeing
stockholders voted 96% for this merger. (Wouldn't a solid social safety net in this country eliminate some of the fear/greed of its citizens?) Between Boeing and Bill Gates' megalomaniacal greed (power hunger), what's happened to this most livable city? Is there nothing Americans won't do for
money?
--Dorian Doe, Green Lake
|