| |
American Newspeak
Hoarded at http://www.scn.org/newspeak
Celebrating cutting edge advances in the Doublethink of the 90's
Written by Wayne Grytting
Smokey the Bear's New Friends
Last year the timber industry failed to get Congress to pass a salvage
logging bill that would have let them thin out trees they judged to be
dead or dying from our national forests. Supporters claimed it was needed
to help control forest fires, while detractors pointed to Weyerhauser's
need for windfall profits. Now they've returned with a new and improved
bill introduced by Rep. Bob Smith (R-OR). The key difference? On top of
tolerating a few more environmental controls, the words "salvage logging"
have been removed. This is a big improvement for, as Rep. Smith notes,
"Salvage has become a name we probably can't use anymore. It's one of
those words that creates a lot of animosity." So Rep. Smith and his
friends have found happier words to use and the salvage logging bill has
become the "Forest Recovery and Restoration Act." Much more positive. This
new name, says Rep Smith, "reflects new sensitivity to the environmental
effect as well as the politics of the matter." Congratulations to the
timber industry on their new "sensitivity." (AP 9/28)
The Honor Among Thieves Dept.
Major corporations have found a new way to avoid costly trials and
convictions for breaking the law. The Wall Street Journal reports that
"Corporations under government investigation are increasingly turning on
their employees to win leniency for themselves." This has proven to be a
win-win solution (except for the employees left holding the bag), thanks to
the 1991 U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which grant leniency to companies who
apply "adequate discipline" to their employees. For example, when Darling
International was accused of illegally dumping blood in the Blue Earth
River in Minnesota, instead of stonewalling, Darling immediately found
four employees to blame, and even provided incriminating evidence to the
government. Federal prosecutors such as Craig Benedict like this because
"you get a lot more justice a lot more quickly." One reason is that
corporations can force employees to answer questions or lose their jobs,
an incentive the government currently lacks. See what benefits cooperation
can bring? (WSJ 10/9)
The Cutting Edge in Comics
A magazine for young men called "Details" has found a unique way to
involve their commercial sponsors. In their October issue, Details
features a 24-page comic section that "weaves sponsors into the plot line
of an edgy comic section," according to Advertising Age. Not only will
readers get to see their favorite ads from Mastercard, L'Oreal, Panasonic
and Sony, but they will get to see their products used by cartoon
characters just like actors do in the movies. The comic book plot revolves
around the adventures of a young in-line skater as he pursues the woman of
his dreams while wearing his Lee jeans and splashing on some Hugo eau de
toilette for good measure. Advertising Age describes the exercise in
erasing the boundaries between ads and magazine content as "breaking new
ground." Details publisher Linda Mason goes a step further. She describes
their ad/cartoon format as "synergistic." I always love it when publishers
learn big words. (AA 10/6)
The Syllogism of the Month
While the Clinton Administration was bringing the "But everyone's doing
it, Mom" defense to new heights in the fundraising scandal, AT&T was
doing an even finer job. Out in California, an organization called
Californians for Telecommunications Choice has been attacking Pacific Bell
for its monopolistic ways. Due to an oversight, I'm sure, CTC forgot to
tell anyone that it had large funding from AT&T for its campaign to
get state legislators to open up the phone market to more competition,
something AT&T has always supported (ahem). But AT&T spokeswoman
Alice Nagle was ready with a stout defense of her company's practice. "All
big corporations," she said, "are involved with coalitions, so it's a
normal, ethical business decision to align" with CTC. I hope everyone
caught this new meaning for the word "ethical" as the residue of what all
big corporations do. You might want to pencil it into your Webster's.
(S.F.Chron. 9/16)
Special thanks this week to Eddie Tews and Ryan Dougherty. This edition
was actually proofread thanks to Jane Hatfield. The author can be reached,
e-mail subscriptions had via wgrytt@blarg.net.
|