| |
An Earth Day Tour: The Color Of Money
by Geov Parrish
April 22 is Earth Day. As such, it seems like a good time to
tour our state's various environmental controversies. There
are actually too many to delve into at once here, which is a
statement in itself. In a state with a remarkable variety of
natural beauty--beauty that drew many of us to live here in
the first place--it's striking how few of these issues will
even be discussed on Earth Day, or are being actively
championed by principled grassroots advocates. We all love
what Washington State used to be, and what we all sort of
vaguely hope and dream might still be out there.
What's going on out there instead? Take the Earth Day tour:
Buckhorn Mountain, in the Okanogan, may not
exist much longer. A proposal for an enormous open pit
cyanide leachate gold mine that would literally remove
two-thirds of the mountain--all public land--has until recently
been relentlessly rammed through federal and county agencies.
Currently, the Dept. of Ecology is reviewing the water permit
and, unless the public pushes them to deny it, the project
will go full steam ahead and Buckhorn Mountain will
disappear. (For details, see ETS! #33, Apr. 22, 1997.)
Hanford is a frequent ETS! topic, but we haven't begun
to do justice to just how bad a mess it is out there,
environmentally and politically. It is literally the most
contaminated nuclear site in the Western Hemisphere, with
hundreds of tanks so toxic regulators haven't even
gotten close enough to them to find out what's in
them--and many are, like the radioactive contaminants in the
groundwater, only yards from the Columbia River and the
region's aquifer. Cleanup has been a taxpayer-supported
fraud, and there's a plan for privatized tritium production
to add to the catastrophe.
In river systems from the Columbia to the Northwest's
smallest streams, salmon restoration will be a hot
topic as sports fishermen, big commercial interests, and
tribes (but not, alas, the fish themselves) will clash over
who gets to "harvest" the few remaining wild salmon. Expect
much avoidance of the real causes of salmon loss: dams (which
block their progress and help predators), clearcutting (which
silts rivers and eliminates canopy, raising stream
temperatures to lethal levels and destroying spawning
grounds), and commercial greed.
Removing those dams is in the news, as Slade Gorton
links the long-standing proposal to take out a useless dam on
the Olympic Peninsula's Elwha River with a demand to maintain
all of them on the entire Columbia/Snake system, an entirely
different (and much larger) watershed. These enormously
destructive dams have been a pork fave for years,
underwriting cheap power for aluminum industries (and
Boeing). Somewhere, Gorton probably will find a Big Green
group willing to make the deal, because they feel his pain.
Meanwhile, the Skykomish tribe is also battling to get a
long-standing dam near Shelton, operated by Tacoma's utility,
removed.
Cheap power may soon be history--at least for non-corporate
users like you and I--with utility deregulation. Aside
from corporate welfare and screwed consumers, deregulation
has huge implications for marketing and use of energy (and
conservation), pollution, and loads of other Earth issues.
Endangered species like the salmon--or the infamous
Northern Spotted Owl--are in for rough times as the
Endangered Species Act (ESA), already seldom enforced, comes
in for renewed legislative attack.
The ESA, for example, has done little (despite the shouting)
to stop clearcutting; logging companies that need to
cash in their assets, and willing lawmakers (who number among
those assets) keep finding ways. Again, Big Green helps, as
with the recent agreement to log four-fifths of Loomis State
Forest. Another battle looms over Plum Creek's threats to log
the rest of the I-90 Snoqualmie corridor, unless it gets a
huge gift--er, "land swap"--from the state.
Here at home, the city of Seattle wants to get in on the
clearcut business, too, by "harvesting" most of the Cedar
River Watershed. The current battle is to get city
council backing for the "100% Reserve" alternative. (For
details, see ETS! Vol. 2, #27, Mar. 17, 1998.)
Important green decisions are often made through assumptions
at the bureaucratic level. We have many examples in our
planning for local infrastructure, much of which
assumes as desirable an aggressive drive for industrial and
business growth well beyond the usual new resident influx.
Such assumptions fuel plans for revising the Growth
Management Act, overhauling the county's water and sewage
systems, upgrading the Port of Seattle, and many others. Such
thinking also underlies many of the provisions of next fall's
transportation levy.
While the state proposes to spend money to underwrite growth,
it's not spending money to clean up the old messes. Toxic
waste sites across the state are festering without
cleanup efforts by the state or the feds. Waterways, too; the
sort of concerted effort that cleaned up Lake Washington a
generation ago couldn't happen in today's regulatory climate.
Tacoma's Commencement Bay, Birch Bay, and Bellingham Bay are
particularly fouled.
In fact, in almost every environmental arena stripped
enforcement is the rule, not the exception. With
startling regularity, corporate pressure has bought off
citizen mandates that put a high price on the value of a
natural, non-toxic environment.
This frightfully incomplete list, and many other issues,
invariably can be traced to the triumph of greed in public
policymaking. Despite widespread, bipartisan commitment to
"environmentalism," it keeps happening.
In this environment, Earth Day photos of kids recycling cans,
volunteers planting trees, New Agers selling videocassettes
on simple living, and greenwashed corporate commitments to
our future generations blah blah blah ring terribly hollow.
The bits we can do, individually and piecemeal, do add up and
are important. But the really big, systemic problems, like
the ones listed above, aren't even be discussed by most
people on Earth Day.
With a handful of exceptions, the lack of principled
environmental advocates on these issues is also striking.
We're in this predicament, despite widespread public approval
for environmental protection, in large part because the big,
established enviro groups have sold out. Our environmental
Vice-President and his boss are a sick fraud, as we've
reported frequently; underlings and Congressional and state
counterparts like Sen. Patty Murray and Gov. Gary Locke are
no better. Yet Big Green groups are only too willing to sell
the farm--or forest, or watershed--for photo ops and mythic
"access" that will never equal what our planet's corporate
rapists can buy. Meanwhile, the grassroots wither.
There are a few exceptions. In Seattle and Olympia, Earth
First! chugs along on a variety of issues; Pacific Crest
Biodiversity Project does some good work, as does Northwest
Ecosystems Alliance in Bellingham. The Okanogan Highlands
Alliance has fought a lonely battle against the Buckhorn
Mountain mine, and Heart of America Northwest has worked hard
to curb Hanford's atrocities. Of late, the Protect Our
Watershed Alliance has single-handedly (and against Sierra
Club opposition) made zero-cut a viable option for the city's
Cedar River Watershed; and the Community Coalition for
Environmental Justice has worked against environmental
racism.
The common point of all these groups is that (with the
exception of EF!, which is more a movement than a group,
anyway) you've probably never heard of them. Name brand
enviro groups, like Earth Day itself, are a feel-good fraud.
Most have a handful of legal or lobbying victories that they
point to, masking a record of constant failure and
accommodation. The only one that ever dabbled in community
organizing or direct action in recent years, Greenpeace, has
abandoned Seattle except for fundraising purposes (and
administering one national campaign).
The lessons: if Earth Day reminds and motivates you to do
something to save our planet--something beyond recycling or
tree-planting--then don't write a check to any group with a
slick annual report. Look around your immediate area, and
find an issue (you won't need to search long) where greed is
overwhelming common sense and the public good. Join or start
your own group. And go kick some Earth-killing ass.
|