From Now On I'm Throwing My Vote Away
by Gregory Leiber
I am going to throw my vote away. I'm going to shitcan it, toss it in the
round file, compost it, drag it to the trash and delete that sucker! How?
I've changed my voter registration to a small alternative party.
For most of my voting life I've been a registered Democrat, with brief
periods registered as a "non-affiliated voter," Oregon's way of saying
I've registered as an independent voter. During the Vietnam war I
belonged to the Peace and Freedom party. The Republicans wouldn't have me
(nor I them) since I refuse to meet their two basic requirements for party
membership: Leave your sense of compassion at the door and worship the All
Mighty Dollar first and foremost.
But I usually registered as a Democrat because I was afraid of "throwing
my vote away." The logic: Voting for anyone other than a candidate from
either of the two major political parties is just a waste, since the
alternative candidates don't stand a snowball's chance in hell.
But I have come to believe that I have thrown away virtually every vote
I've cast for a political candidate since I cast my first presidential
vote for George McGovern way back in '72, arguably one of the most
intelligent and compassionate presidential candidates in this century.
The major differences between the Democrats and Republicans started to
disappear during the Reagan years. The Demos basically handed Reagan the keys
to the store, even though they still had a majority in Congress. It had
become obvious to the Democrats that even a pretense of consideration for the
poor and disenfranchised people of this country was no longer popular
with the majority of voters.
So they joined the Reagan Revolution and gave him virtually everything
he wanted. You want to cut taxes and increase military spending and
create a humongous budget deficit that will affect future generations
seemingly forever? You want to gut environmental safeguards so your
fat-cat friends can make a little more profit at the expense of everyone
else? You want to gut whatever regulatory power the federal government
has in the name of "cutting Big Government?" Hey--no problemo! Where
do I sign on to the "revolution?"
But eventually many voters grew weary of the depressing "Winter of
Reagan" and yearned for a "kinder, gentler" America. Many people were ready
to allow a little compassion back into the political process. And so the
Democrats gave us Bill Clinton.
My wife Marilyn was so hopeful about Clinton (and Hillary...) that she sent
the Demos a contribution. It wasn't much by campaign financing standards;
around $100 or so. But it was significant for us because we had never donated
money to a candidate before.
But what a disappointment Clinton has been! Not his sexual meanderings; I
couldn't care less what he does in that area of his life. I am appalled by
his lack of good judgment while living in a glass house. But Clinton lost me
long before we ever heard of Monica.
His initial clumsy handling of the homosexuals in the military issue was a
terrible choice for his first big battle with Congress, wasting an enormous
amount of political good will on a problem that could have waited while he
built his Washington power base. And then he could have just signed an
Executive Order telling the military to quit worrying about the sexual
proclivities of its soldiers, period. After all, he is the
Commander-In-Chief.
And then there was the attempt to restructure the health care system,
which started out on such a hopeful note but then crashed and burned
because once again Clinton didn't lead--he compromised and finagled and
tried to appease his opponents until the reforms first proposed metamorphosed
into the HMO situation we have today. It soon became apparent that this way
of handling the tough issues would be Bill Clinton's modus operandi for the
rest of his presidency. He has straddled the middle of the fence so well that
he stands for nothing at all.
So here we are in 1998. A while back I saw Gore Vidal interviewed by
Charlie Rose. In response to a question about today's political scene
Vidal replied, "Congress is a group of lawyers paid by corporations to do
their bidding. They no longer represent the average person and people
know this." It hit me then-and-there that I no longer wanted to even
appear to support the current political process in America.
The first and easiest thing to do would be to change my party
affiliation on my voter registration. Now what to change to? I'm
intrigued by the Libertarians but I suspect they're actually
closet Republicans with a screw loose. I love the idea of government
staying out of so-called "victimless crimes" and other areas of its
citizens' private lives but the idea of doing away with all government
regulation whatsoever scares the bejesus out of me. The track record
of people allowed to plunder without restraints is not too good.
And then like magic one day I stumbled across a Green Party website. Right in
front of me was their Mission Statement; I couldn't believe what I was
reading. It started by stating that "The Pacific Party" (its name in Oregon)
strives for cultural diversity and gender balance and believes in a limited
government whose legitimate functions include: "Ensuring equal rights
for all...that basic human rights are met...meaningful work...restoring
the natural environment...promoting energy conservation...addressing the
struggle of Native peoples...ensure the right to privacy...promoting an
open, accessible, and truly democratic process." This is a political party?
I don't care that my local PBS station decided to not allow any third
party candidates to participate in a locally televised debate. It was
decided by the station that they were going to follow the League of
Women Voters stand that "serious" candidates were those who had at least
10% of the voting public behind them according to a survey. So much for
an open democratic process. So much for PBS being an alternative to
network television.
Yes, I'm going Green. Last night I ran into a friend at the local
elementary school track where Marilyn and I often take our nightly
walk. The subject of Clinton and politics in general came up and I told
Lynn of my decision. Not surprisingly she replied, "How can you do that?
Do you want the Republicans to have a veto-proof president in the White
House?" And I said I'm no longer going to vote for the lesser of two
evils. Neither the Democrats nor Republicans need my help; the way
they're going the political process as we know is going to self-destruct.
And I am willing to take my chances with a different system.
So I am going to throw my vote away and feel good while I am doing it.
I'm going to vote for Blair Bobier, the Pacific Party candidate for
Oregon governor. I like his smile and the fact that his stand on the
issues means it's a lost cause. In my short life I've seen enough "lost
causes" become effective movements to make me hopeful about taking this
stand. It sure beats the alternative.
Gregory Leiber is a loyal ETS! reader in southern Oregon. Copyright
Gregory Leiber 1998.
|