| |
Stump Talk
by Maria Tomchick
Ocean Going
There's a battle brewing on the King County Council over the construction
of a new sewage processing facility in Seattle. All the council members
agree that we need more infrastructure to handle a growing population; yet,
none of the council members wants the facility built in his or her
neighborhood.
Into the breech stepped the Seattle Times, with an article and an
irresponsible editorial questioning the need for secondary treatment of
sewage. We could save so much money, they reasoned, if only we just strain
out the big solids and let most of the toxic particles pass on through the
outflow pipe and into Puget Sound. What the articles didn't tell us is that
secondary treatment is required by state law and the federal Clean Water
Act. Further, secondary treatment removes far more toxic particles from
sewage than primary treatment alone.
Right now raw sewage already leaks into Lake Washington, the Ship Canal,
Lake Union, and the sound. Seattle's deteriorating sewer system (maintained
by the county) is so overtaxed that heavy rains frequently bring sewer
backups into our waterways. In addition, the proliferation of boats,
houseboats, apartments, and homes along our shorelines contribute to the
problem. The Port of Seattle is also getting in on the act: the
construction of a cruise ship dock at the Bell Street Pier will invite an
industry to town that's known all over the world for dumping raw or
minimally treated sewage into formerly pristine waters.
The Times article based its argument on the fact that Puget Sound is
connected to the Pacific Ocean. Because the sound has strong currents, the
author reasoned, water would flushes the waste on through Puget Sound and
disperse it directly out to sea. Local environmentalists, environmental
engineers, employees of the state Dept. of Ecology, and members of the
governor's Puget Sound Water Quality Team were quick to point out that
those strong currents mostly move back and forth in the sound, much
like water sloshing in a bowl. Dump pollution in one end of the bowl and it
quickly spreads throughout the whole basin.
Aside from this fact, the Times writer articulated a common but erroneous
assumption: the oceans are indestructible. Nothing could be further from
the truth, as researchers at Louisiana State University can tell us. They
just released the results of a study showing that every year during the
summer months, a 7,000 mile wide section of the Gulf of Mexico becomes a
"dead zone" because of agricultural and industrial waste. The technical
term is "hypoxic zone"--a region of water that has too little oxygen in it
to support most marine animals. What was particularly stunning about the
study is that the Gulf of Mexico is widely open to ocean currents, unlike
other bodies of water that have large dead zones (for example: Lake Baikal,
the Black Sea, the Baltic Sea, the New York Bight, and Chesapeake Bay).
Furthermore, the Gulf of Mexico's dead zone is increasing at a rapid pace;
it has already doubled in size since 1992. This alone speaks to the ocean's
inability to flush out even the most open bays and sounds.
Yet another discovery has cast doubt on the ocean's ability to absorb the
byproducts of our modern lifestyle without washing it all back to us. A
University of California Sea Grant study has found that DDT, PCBs, and
other chemical deposits left in the offshore sediments of the Palos Verdes
Shelf are being pulled out of the sediments and dispersed along the
California coast. First dumped into the sea by sewage outflows and
pesticide manufacturing in the 50s and 60s, the DDT hasn't been broken down
by the ocean's currents, as many scientists once believed it would be.
Instead, the ocean is sucking it up out of even the deepest deposits and
sending it up the coast to the Santa Monica and San Pedro basins.
Evidently, in the ocean, DDT and PCBs move very easily from sediments into
water, even when there's no physical disturbance of the ocean floor. The
sea literally takes the garbage we give it and spits it back at us.
And we deserve it.
Sources for this article include: "Crystal clear views on sewage treatment
issue" by Neil Modie, the Seattle P-I, 2/2/99, page B2; "Midwest Farm
Runoff Causes 'Dead Zone' in Gulf, Scientists Say" by Paul Recer,
Associated Press, 1/25/99; "Farmers Can Help With Dead Zone in Gulf,"
UniScience News Net, Inc., 1/25/99 at unisci.com/stories/19991/0125994.htm;
and "Offshore DDT Deposit Spreading, Research Suggests," Science Daily,
2/3/99 at www.sciencedaily.com.
|