| |
Why Pay Taxes?
by Geov Parrish
As with so many other instances of corporate welfare, corruption,
bureaucratic contempt, and state brutality, the Balkans bombings raise an
obvious but seldom-asked question: why do so many people pay their income
taxes?
This is not a rhetorical question. At the local, state, and especially
federal level, we now have a political system where low, middle, and even
upper middle income people get far less back in services and benefits from
government than they pay in; and the extremely wealthy--the top 1%--get far
more. Military spending, non-military corporate welfare, and interest on
the national debt alone account for something like 60% of the federal
budget each year. The impact is even greater when we consider how much
money isn't in the budget in the first place because of what the rich
don't pay. Corporations and high-income folks get more tax breaks
each year--this year, capital gains (federal) and Prop. 48 (state)--while
already-inadequate social spending continues to be gutted and more and more
prisons get built to hold the people who can't cope.
The very rich are richer while everyone else's wages lag. Governments are
one of the primary mechanisms for this wealth transfer. The money pushing
the Dow Jones over 10 bazillion isn't being newly printed; that would be
inflationary. Much of it is simply fictional. But when cashed, it comes
from somewhere--often from your pockets, via Tax Day. A tiny bit of the
proceeds gets recycled into purchasing policies ensuring a tax, legal, and
regulatory structure even more favorable to them and less favorable to
everyone else. Ordinary citizens today have little meaningful choice or
input on almost any important public policy issue at the state level, and
none nationally. The stockholder model--one dollar, one share, one
vote--has very nearly become what's left of representative democracy.
So why do so many people pay their taxes?
Two hundred twenty or so years ago this was called "taxation without
representation" and we threw out the government. We celebrate this
tradition. We don't take it seriously.
But what if we refused? The federal government in particular is vulnerable;
the income tax system is based on voluntary compliance, and the IRS--though
fearsome in its media-assisted reputation--is essentially a very large, and
not very efficient, collection agency. People laugh off collection agency
bills simply because they don't want to (or can't) pay, but quake in terror
of the IRS when the money isn't just going to a private business--it's
going, in large quantities, to an institution now dedicated at the highest
levels to enriching its patrons even if it means killing you. We are
volunteering to buy the bullets for our firing squads.
This isn't a Freemen or Posse Comitatus-type question of the legitimacy of
taxation. Quite the opposite; it's specifically because portions of
everyone's labor should contribute to the collective well-being of the
community (rather than, say, Paul Allen's net worth) that our current tax
system is ethically bankrupt. (Washington state, with its reliance on
regressive sales and property taxes, is, among states, one of the worst.)
The issue here is where the money is going, how it's being spent, and how
the spending decisions are made. People struggling to pay the rent, who
can't afford health care, have no job security or retirement prospects,
can't find affordable daycare, college, or anything between for their kids,
and so on, tithe 30% or more of their income to people who already have
enough yachts and private jets to get by.
There are a few folks saying no: war tax resisters refusing, for reasons of
conscientious objection, to fund militarism; people intentionally living
under the taxable income; people who, forced to choose between enough food
to feed the family in April and paying the IRS, make the eminently
political decision to forego hunger. As usual, there were small groups of
folks leafletting at area post offices, and having a vigil or protest
downtown, on Tax Day. You'd think there'd be millions.
Resisting taxes--symbolically or fully--has risks. It can be a nuisance, or
it can complicate one's life immensely, and no one should undertake it
without understanding the risks. But there are also risks involved in
passively cooperating with our own demise. And it's simply amazing that
more people don't look closely at which risk is greater.
Nonviolent Action Community of Cascadia (NACC) has resources and
experienced war tax resistance counselors available for folks who are
considering taking action by withholding their taxes and need more
information or counseling. Call 206-547-0952, or e-mail
cmtc@igc.apc.org.
|