Nader in 2000?
by Patrick Mazza
Signs are increasingly pointing to a second Green Party presidential bid by
Ralph Nader
Appearing at a Connecticut meeting of the Association of State Green
Parties (ASGP) in early June, Nader gave California delegates permission to
enter his name in next year's California presidential primary. Nader, who
was urged for two decades to run for president before he allowed his name
to be used in the 1996 presidential primary, does not hand out such
permissions lightly.
California Green Party rules and state election laws made Nader's
permission necessary. But he will make no official announcement until
January, he said. Nonetheless, Nader sounded very much like a candidate,
down to repeated skewerings of Al Gore for his corporate kowtows to
industries ranging from drugs to automobiles.
Nader took pains to resolve nagging questions remaining from his 1996
presidential bid. A number of Greens have been skeptical about a new Nader
candidacy because of his self-imposed 1996 $5,000 spending limit and a
sense he did not seriously campaign. A better organized and funded campaign
could have pushed Nader beyond the one percent he received, many believe.
He seemed to agree. Prefacing many points with "if I run," Nader
promised no limits on fundraising this time and "100 days on the ground"
with at least three major appearances in every state where he is on the
ballot. He would aim to "catapult the Green Party over the five percent
level." Noted Nader, "Six to seven percent is not out of the realm of the
possible."
Nader backed that with a powerful electoral arithmetic. In 1996, he said,
polls showed only seven percent were aware he was running. Nader, in
effect, was the choice of at least one in seven of those people. And he was
only on the ballot in about half the states. A 2000 race would see him on
many more state ballots, 40-45, with earlier and better organized
petitioning efforts, he said.
Nader called on Greens to "think unconventionally," to invent "new ways to
campaign and catch the imagination of people...The worst thing is to have a
new party do the same thing as the old parties."
For example, Greens should hold not only fundraisers, but also hour-raisers
where people pledge volunteer time, "which is better than money." Nader
also said campaign appearances will include detailed information on local
issues to give them added visibility. Greens will receive confirmed
campaign dates at least two months in advance to organize strong local
appearances, Nader promised.
As in '96, Nader would continue to focus on "building fundamental
structural policies for democracy." At the same time, in contrast to "the
poverty of ideas" coming from the corporate parties, Nader would showcase
new ideas that work, "the scenario of the possible. For example, people
don't know how economic solar has become. We can translate a lot of this
information."
Nader made clear a fundamental goal of any 2000 presidential race is to
build the Green Party. "I would like to see a tenfold increase in every
criteria you use to measure the Green Party...people, money,
candidates...Then it's really reached critical mass for the future."
"Strong citizen institutions and a strong Green Party go hand in hand,"
Nader said.
One candidate who will not be returning is Winona LaDuke, Nader's 1996
running mate. The Native American activist was one of over 20 individuals
polled by the ASGP Presidential Exploratory Committee. Matters on the White
Earth Reservation will keep her busy over the coming year, she said. Nader,
who built a strong relationship with LaDuke in '96, expressed
disappointment.
Nader said Greens would still have to put up with some "idiosyncrasies" --
He will remain an independent and not join the Green Party. "It's very
important to have people be for the Green Party as well as of the Green
Party." Greens will have to decide how they feel about that.
Scott McClarty, a D.C. Green, distributed a flyer previous to Nader's
appearance asking, "But is Mr. Nader really Green?" Also a human rights
activist, McClarty and others have strongly criticized Nader for a '96
comment to William Safire that he would not discuss "gonadal politics."
The right-wing columnist was baiting Nader with a series of lifestyle-issue
questions.
Responding to a question from the floor by McClarty, Nader raised the
"gonadal politics" comment himself. In 1996, Nader said, except for that
Safire column, he was successful at keeping press coverage on his basic
message.
"I don't want focuses on structural abuses to be blurred by having an
opinion on everything. You allow the press to destroy your message that
way. I don't want to be diverted from these basic structural issues."
Added Nader, "Anyone who knows my work for 40 years knows I don't turn my
back on underdogs or the repressed."
State party delegates agreed that the nominating convention slated for June
2000 will consider a "none of the above" option--Not all Greens are
convinced the party should run a presidential campaign next year. And two
other possible nominees have expressed interest. Marianne Williamson,
author of numerous books including, "The Healing of America," said her
issues would include restoring democracy, campaign reform,
genetically-engineered food, military budget cuts and a "Marshall Plan for
inner cities." Connecticut Green Ron Ouellette named among his top issues
corporate ownership of the election process, living wages, a ban on weapons
of mass destruction and renegotiation of trade treaties.
Filmmaker Michael Moore was reportedly mulling his response to the
Presidential Exploratory Committee.
Ralph Nader looks ready to flame Gore and other corporate politicians next
year, and stoke a powerful Green fire that will burn long beyond 2000.
|