| |
Working for Peace
by John Chapman
On the morning of August 6th, 1945, air-raid sirens alerted the city of
Hiroshima to the approach of American planes. Air-raid sirens had become a
daily event in Hiroshima, as a nearby lake served as a rendezvous point for
bombing raids throughout the south of Japan. Minutes later the all-clear
sounded. Since there were only three planes, it was assumed that it was
only a reconnaissance patrol. The people of Hiroshima emerged from their
bomb-shelters.
Moments later, at 8:15 am, the world ended for the people of Hiroshima. A
co-pilot on a B-29 named the Enola Gay wrote in his log "My God, what have
we done?" and 130,000 people died. Three days later, the same fate befell
the city of Nagasaki, and another 70,000 died. The atomic age had brutally
begun.
When I was nine, my family visited Hiroshima. I would like to say that this
was part of some peace pilgrimage, the beginning of a lifetime of peace
activism, but that was not the case. We went because of the global reach of
U.S. militarism, because an uncle was stationed at the U.S. Marine base
outside of Hiroshima. Along with the other sights in the area, we went to
see Peace Park, Hiroshima's memorial to the devastation of the atomic bomb.
My memories are that of a nine-year-old, as interested in the enormous
beetles for sale in the stores throughout Hiroshima as I was in the
history. But one cannot visit Peace Park, and stand on the spot where hell
opened up on the earth in a 6,000-degree flash of heat, and not be moved.
One can't look across the river at the A-bomb Dome, the skeletal ruins of
Hiroshima's Industrial Promotion Hall left standing in memorial, and not
tremble for a moment at the terrifying power of the bomb. My parents deemed
my brother and me too young to see the Peace Museum--with its gruesome
photos and artifacts of the bomb's deadly impact--but we could hear the
stories.
"The young girl pointed to the sky and said 'Mommy, look at the airplane.'
I reached for her, but she turned and burst into flames."
I don't remember whose story this is, and to whoever that person is, I must
apologize. It may be that in the 21 years since I heard it, I have
remembered the story wrong--but how vividly I remember my own mother
reading it from our guidebook as we toured Peace Park. The image of that
child, probably no older than I, bursting into flames will never leave me.
This is not the picture of nuclear war you will hear from the Pentagon. The
language of nuclear war is one of denial: "deterrence," "delivery vehicle,"
"credibility," "first strike," "sub-strategic," "nuclear umbrella,"--all
sterile words to hide the reality, the shattered bodies, the little girl
bursting into flames.
Or the boy, swimming in one of Hiroshima's seven rivers with his friends.
He dove under the water the moment that the flash hit, and the water
protected him from the intense heat. But when he emerged, the friends
around him were all horribly, fatally burned. He dove under water in a
normal world, and emerged in Hell.
Some will argue that the use of the atomic bomb was necessary to end the
war, that it did less harm than the inevitable invasion of Japan would
have. Others argue that Japan was on the verge of collapse, and that the
bomb was used to threaten the Soviet Union and begin the Cold War (a view I
think is closer to, but not entirely, the truth). Historians will argue
these points--as they should--but in the end there is only one truth that
matters: having seen this destruction, we can never let it happen again.
Sadly we have a long way to go to insure that. In a few days, when we
commemorate the 54th anniversary of that first atomic bomb, we will do so
in a world still terrifyingly close to seeing nuclear weapons used again.
We will do so in a world with more than 10,000 active nuclear warheads,
each one more powerful than the one that destroyed Hiroshima. We will do so
in a world where thousands of those weapons remain on high alert, ready to
launch with only a few minutes notice.
The United States refuses to take the simple step of adopting a policy not
to be the first to use nuclear weapons, even though it has the largest
conventional military in the world. Russia declares itself to be more
dependent than ever on using nuclear weapons to make up for a conventional
military that is falling apart. India and Pakistan have openly tested
weapons, with the terrifying prospect that their long-smoldering border
dispute could flare into a nuclear war. Both Russia and the United States
have seen incidents in this decade where either human or computer error
caused their military command to think they were under attack, almost
triggering a nuclear war in retaliation.
However, what worries me most is not the threat of an accident triggering a
global nuclear war, but rather the threat that some nation will start a
"limited" nuclear war. It could be India and Pakistan lobbing their handful
of warheads at each other, or Russia using a few tactical nuclear weapons
in Chechnya or some other breakaway republic to do what its army cannot,
or, the United States deciding it's better to use a few nuclear weapons
than to risk U.S. casualties. (U.S. military strategy is increasingly to
use cruise missiles and high-altitude bombing to destroy without risking
American lives--are tactical nukes the next step?) Such a "limited" nuclear
war might not result in the global extinction that we feared under the cold
war, but it would mean a repeat of the horror that struck Hiroshima and
Nagasaki: the whole-scale slaughter of civilians. In some ways, as the
threat of global annihilation decreases, the threat that some nation will
risk using nuclear weapons grows.
But there is also a great ray of hope: during the 54 years since the first
atomic bombs were used on Japan, we have prevented another from being used.
If the peace movement has not stopped the governments of this planet from
wasting uncountable resources in building and planning for nuclear war, we
have thus far prevented it from happening. If we have been able to prevent
it in the past, we can prevent it in the future. We have an obligation to
the memory of those who died in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and to our children
who will inherit this world from us, to see that this tragedy never happens
again.
In the center of Peace Park, on roughly the same spot where the deadly bomb
exploded, lies a memorial arch with an inscription that translates as "Rest
in peace, for the mistake shall not be repeated." Let's make sure this
message remains true.
>From August 7-9, the Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action (at 16159
Clear Creek Road, Poulsbo) will hold their annual weekend of reflection and
action against the deployment of Trident nuclear submarines at Bangor Naval
Base. Last year, protesters blocked the main gates at Bangor and were
arrested. Eight were brought to trial and acquitted by a Kitsap County
Court--a victory for the protesters and a validation of their key defense
strategy: nuclear weapons are illegal under international law. To
participate in the weekend's activities, which may include an action of
nonviolent civil disobedience, contact Ground Zero at 360-377-2586 or
http://www.gzcenter.org or info@gzcenter.org.
|