| |
Backtalk
ETS! encourages comments, feedback, tips, corrections, and
info! Please keep them as concise as possible so we can
print as many different voices as possible: ETS!, P.O. Box
85541, Seattle WA 98145, or e-mail ets@scn.org.
Flinching and Cowering
ETS!,
RE: Albert Kaufman's letter in the 8/18/99 ETS, about the Blue Angels.
I agree with Mr. Kaufman sentiments, and share his empathy. The Blue
Angels' loud and offensive display glorifies warfare and mocks its victims
(not to mention annoys us on the ground).
I don't doubt the sincerity of Kaufman's letter, but I wish he hadn't been
so patronizing. I find it hard to believe he watched "young Vietnamese,
Cambodian and Central American families flinch and cower," like pets on July
Fourth. No doubt the jets brought back painful memories for them, but he
describes a scenario that could air on a sitcom. His points stand up just
fine without having to resort to racist, condescending hyperbole.
Of course, not having specifically observed any reactions by the groups in
question during that weekend (at least none I remember), I might be wrong.
If so, my apologies to Mr. Kaufman for doubting him.
--Dave Miller, Seattle
Bullshit
Now that Mumia Abu-Jamal has admitted to the killing of Daniel Faulkner,
don't you feel like a real asshole? I hope so.
Stephen Garner, via e-mail
G.P. replies: Now that an ex-employee of the state claims to suddenly
remember Abu-Jamal "confessing" to him many years ago, and Abu-Jamal denies
it, aren't you embarrassed that your lame-ass allies in the mainstream media
(like ABC) are tripping all over themselves to fry a possibly innocent man?
Don't you want to know who actually killed Daniel Faulkner? Don't you
want the accused, whoever that is, to have a fair trial as guaranteed under
the Constitution? If not, don't you feel like a real asshole? I hope so.
Another liberation movement
Dear Editors,
I'm enjoying my subscription to ETS! and loved the starting quote of the
June 25th issue. I have been maintaining for the longest time that Clinton
is like Hitler and that Hilary is no feminist/humanist icon.
I would like to make a suggestion: After reading your noble mission
statement, I realized that one giant group of oppressed people was not
mentioned--people with disabilities. With the rise of Social Darwinist
politics, we are becoming even more marginalized than before because we are
losing many fundamental parts of medical coverage, because the workplace is
becoming increasingly competitive and cutthroat, and because of the rising
Hitlerian fascination with fitness and health as a paradigm for moral
rectitude (this doesn't only apply to gay persons with AIDS). And the
Supreme Court's gutting of the Americans With Disabilites Act this week has
made us yet more vulnerable to oppression. Indeed, more and more, W.E.B.
DuBois' brilliant analysis of the economic and social oppression of
black people fits the situation of most people with disabilities. I hope
you will include us in your mission statement in future.
Very sincerely,
Ms. Billie M. Spaight, via e-mail
G.P. replies: first, that's not our mission statement, simply a quick
satiric riff on who we are. Our mission statement is as follows: "Missions
were used by the 18th century Spanish to colonize Mexican California. Their
presence was instrumental in the genocide of Native Californians. We oppose
them."
Second, I can think of at least a dozen "isms" not included in that list,
including disabilities, all of which are far more important than ugly
buildings. That's not the point.
Third, and most important--and I say this as a disabled person, as someone
who had two strokes last year and a double-organ transplant in 1994, and
still dependent on a depressed immune system to survive--I find comparisons
of the plight of the disabled, or any other oppressed group, to that of
African-Americans to be patently offensive. Nothing--I repeat, NOTHING--
compares to 400 years of being bought and sold like chattel. NOTHING compares
to being considered a piece of disposable property belonging to a slaveowner.
NOTHING compares to the legacy of operating in a society where many would
just as soon you still be slaves. Nothing. Similarly, with Native Americans,
NOTHING compares to surviving, barely, a systematic centuries-long,
hemisphere-wide campaign of intentional extermination. Nothing.
When people with disabilities, or any group that has legitimate gripes with
how our society treats them (or, in my case, us), compares their struggle to
much more severe plights (usually the civil rights struggle or other facets
of the African-American experience), it trivializes that experience. That's
not only insulting, it's unnecessary.
The experiences of people with disabilities are unique. The ignorance and
hostility much of society holds for them is demonstrated amply not only by
the Supreme Court's recent decision, but the distinct lack of outcry by
pundits and mainstream media that greeted it. But it's not slavery, it's not
Reconstruction, and it's not Dubois. Some perspective, please.
Hey, Kids! Let's Create Value!
Dear Madam or Sir:
I am a regular customer at Tully's stores in San Francisco. (Tully's, as
you may know, also has stores in Washington State, Idaho, and the Far East
-- also under the name "Brown & Cole"). Every working day starts with a
cup of Tully's French roast. Though I have a wide variety of choices both
at work and near my home (including Pasqua, Starbucks, and several local
shops), I have consistently chosen Tully's for the superior flavor of the
coffee.
Yesterday on my way back to work from lunch, I stopped in at the Tully's
store on Irving Street for a quick cup. While adding some non-fat milk to
my coffee, I noticed a sign on the wall displaying a mission statement and
the Tully's "Values". The first value was "To create value for our
shareholders" (or some similar wording).
This hit me like a fist to my stomach.
I am well aware that, in today's corporate world, emphasis is on profit
above all. But to so blatantly advertise it in the store, with the
concomitant implications of ignoring the effects of such a "value" system,
is to me profoundly offensive and painful. The placement of profits above
any and all other values implies that Tully's is willing to mistreat their
employees, disregard their customers, and exploit those who farm their
coffees, if doing so will "create value for the shareholders".
And they place this statement with pride in their stores!
I, certainly, will no longer be able to make my purchases at Tully's.
While I will miss the excellent coffee, some things in life are far more
important than my own self-interest. I do sincerely wish that Tully's felt
the same way.
Regards,
Juliette Cutler Page, San Francisco
We'll Work On It
ETS!,
In some of your articles on local politics you should include
websites/e-mail addresses for those people in power who are destroying our
streams, razing our forests, and draining our resources. I think it would
help tremendously if we could flood the bastards with e-mails.
Rory Barnes, via e-mail
|