How It Was Done
by Geov Parrish
Tuesday, November 30, 1999 will forever be the day the WTO stood still.
On one magical day, a few thousand protesters, many under the age of 25,
effectively shut down the most powerful organization on earth. They
succeeded despite months of preparation by the Seattle Police Department
and a host of other local, state, and federal agencies. How did it happen?
The strategy of the Direct Action Network (DAN) was relatively simple.
Protest organizers targeted the Paramount Theater--where WTO activities
were scheduled to start--and divided the surrounding area into 13 pie
wedges. Different affinity groups took responsibility for blocking key
intersections and hotels in each wedge. Organizers assumed they would not
be able to get near the Paramount itself, and so sought to gridlock
downtown, preventing delegates in their limos, cabs, and hotel rooms from
getting to their appointed talks.
The strategy succeeded beyond DAN's wildest expectations. Until the tear
gas flew, a carnival atmosphere prevailed in the downtown streets, with
music, drumming, giant puppets, and other festive accoutrements. The
success was due to two factors. First, a flood of activists were willing to
brave 7 AM rains to shut the WTO down. Optimistic organizers had hoped for
a couple thousand on the morning streets of downtown Seattle. By the end of
the day some were estimating that 35,000 were taking part in the
protests--excluding the big labor march. The police had no idea.
The affinity groups spent the whole day blocking their intersections and
entrances, largely untouched by police. While craziness erupted around
them, the affinity groups held their ground, linking arms, locking down, or
(in one case at Boren and Pine) erecting a massive tripod. Despite what was
at times extreme provocation, the protests remained almost entirely
nonviolent. Frustrated delegates were engaged in conversations with them;
when vandalism did erupt, peaceful protesters tried to stop it.
The second factor was what can only be construed as a massive
miscalculation by police. In ringing Metro buses and police lines to
protect the Paramount and Convention Center, they forgot to leave a way for
delegates to get in. Or out.
It would have been simple for police to provide a corridor from hotels to
the meeting place, but they didn't. By the time it occurred to them,
thousands of protesters were barring the way. Throughout the morning,
police were completely outnumbered by nonviolent protesters, singing,
chanting, and generally having the time of their lives.
But rather than ask how a ragtag army of activists shut down the WTO, the
media found a better, if ultimately far less important, story: broken
windows.
By late afternoon, with most of the peaceful protesters trying to save
themselves and innocent bystanders from tear gas, rubber bullets, and
pepper spray, groups of a couple dozen alleged anarchists made at least two
passes through downtown, breaking windows and in two cases (a Starbucks and
a Radio Shack) looting. The damage generally took place away from the
affinity group protesters and police lines, with the culprits using the
larger demonstration as a cover for their own cowardly agenda.
There was an agreement in place between the loosely-knit group of West
Coast anarchists that organized for the WTO, and the Direct Action Network,
to respect the nonviolence code downtown during the day of November 30. The
nonviolence code agreed to by participants in the November 30 direct action
reflected the reality that most of America values property over democracy
in action. It was a protest that, with exposure to the totalitarian nature
of the WTO and transnational corporate rule, a broad cross-section of our
society could support.
That agreement was, obviously, broken. The anarchists' (a group in Eugene
has claimed responsibility for at least some of the damage) enemy here was
not the state, nor corporate America. Those windows cost a few bucks; the
expenses will be picked up by insurance companies. The real damage was done
to the integrity of an action that was successful enough to shut down the
most powerful organization on earth. That reality was lost in the
overreaction to property damage. The Eugene anarchists' actions were a
calculated attack not on the corporate state, but on the resistance to it.
Unfortunately, it also gave anarchism a bad name. The direct action that
shut down the WTO was genuine anarchism in action last Tuesday. The
glass-breaking and graffiti was, however unwittingly, abetting the state.
A true anarchist--as in the Seattle General Strike of 1919--works through
mutual aid, not through taking their most likely compatriots, some of whom
also self-identify as anarchists, and kicking them in the teeth. A few
minutes of glass-breaking was far more effective than months of police
infiltration would have been. Possibly the most significant mass action in
our lifetimes was a lot less effective in its global message than it could
have been thanks to a few dozen people out of 50,000.
Those 50,000, however, are an enormous hope for the future. It's a safe
statement that progressive politics in Seattle will never be the same. A
wide spectrum of people worked together last week who have never--or very
seldom--worked together before: labor with environmental, with student and
religious, with social justice groups and anti-police brutality and civil
rights organizations. New leaders emerged; new skills were learned. And
most of all, we learned that when we work together, we can win. Even
against a seemingly insurmountable foe.
Anti-WTO organizing must continue. Although we'll certainly never be
inviting the WTO back to Seattle, local activists can still play a vital
role in telling our stories and inspiring people around the world who are
working on similar issues. We also have work to do in holding our
disgustingly pro-free-trade elected officials accountable.
And speaking of holding officials accountable ... there will also be a
lot of work to do in the aftermath of the suspension of civil rights
and wanton police brutality that marked the city's response to activists'
success. As described in a previous article, police and jail officers were
out of control, and somebody's going to pay for that. That issue, and the
jury trials of hundreds of illegally arrested activists, should keep us all
quite busy in the coming months.
|