| |
One Planet
by Maria Tomchick
Zimbabwe's Land Crisis
The press has been full of articles condemning the black squatters who are
taking over white-owned farms in Zimbabwe. Each article details acts of
violence--the killing of a white farmer or the beatings of black employees
of white farmers. Usually the articles claim that the black squatters are
members of President Robert Mugabe's ZANU-PF party, and each article
mentions that Mugabe has been in power since the country gained
independence in 1980--in other words, he's a "president-for-life," a term
reserved exclusively for African politicians. The inference is clear:
Mugabe and his supporters are racists, and land reform always leads to
violence and injustice. The reality, however, is more complicated.
The history of colonial Africa is not pretty. Whole tribes were nearly
wiped out by a combination of displacement, slavery, and forced labor
imposed by the white colonists. Genocide--a term that's thrown around quite
loosely these days--accurately applies to white colonial policies
throughout Africa: colonial governments purposefully decided to butcher
whole ethnic groups of indigenous African people down to the last man,
woman, and child. The enormous, white-owned plantations in Zimbabwe make up
the best arable land in the nation; it was stolen from its original,
indigenous inhabitants who were either forced to work for white farmers or
driven into "reserves." These are facts that cannot be denied.
Recent history is also important. The war of independence in Zimbabwe
(1965-80) was fought primarily for land reform. Upon independence, the new
constitution specified that the government could not confiscate white-owned
farms, but had to purchase the farms from those willing to sell. The
British, the former colonial government, granted 44 million pounds sterling
to Zimbabwe for the purchase of this land, but there were few willing to
sell. Today, about 4,400 white farmers work over 70% of the arable land in
Zimbabwe to grow mostly tobacco, while one million black farmers scrape out
a miserable existence on dry, rocky soil.
In 1990, the provision to purchase land from willing sellers expired and
the government passed a law allowing it to make compulsory purchases, but
the process has been slow. The British have frozen payments to Zimbabwe for
land repurchases, claiming that most of the land has gone to Mugabe's
associates and that dividing the lands up into small plots would destroy
Zimbabwe's agricultural export market. Three years ago Mugabe announced a
list of 1,500 farms that would be bought without the owners' consent, but
the pace has been slowed because of scarcity of funds. In addition, some of
the farms were bought without exactly adhering to the legal process and
some white owners have been able to sue in the courts and re-acquire their
lands.
Last November a constitutional committee made up of ZANU-PF members and
opposition parties wrote a draft of a new constitution. Opposition parties
protested that the new draft gave the president more power, instead of
less, as they had desired. A new coalition of opposition parties, which
includes the white farmers union and urban trade unions, formed to oppose
ZANU-PF in general elections scheduled for late June 2000, and they lobbied
heavily against the new constitution. In February of this year, the
constitution was put to a nationwide, general referendum and it was
defeated 55% to 45%; this was widely viewed as a vote of no confidence in
Mugabe. High inflation, a fuel crisis, Zimbabwe's involvement in the Congo
War, and stories of corruption among top government officials helped to
defeat the referendum.
The new constitution would have enshrined the government's ability to seize
white-owned farms without compensation. Within a few days of the
vote, a dozen white-owned farms had been occupied by poor, black farmers
led by war veterans. The veterans have their own bone to pick with the
opposition parties, who have defeated legislation for increased
compensation for veterans. The veterans and squatters have received weapons
and food from members of the military, with whom the veterans have close
ties.
Mugabe supports the farm occupations, and this had made him more popular
with rural blacks. The occupations, however, have caused a split in the
ZANU-PF; some of Mugabe's senior ministers have condemned the occupations.
The international response has been mixed. European nations and the
international lending agencies have frozen funds and aid to Zimbabwe, while
a number of black African leaders, including Thabo Mbeke of South Africa,
have voiced support for the land occupations, although this support is
growing thin as attacks against opposition party members have increased.
Land reform is a vital issue for poor, subsistence farmers in Zimbabwe and
all over the world. The western press, however, has not covered the issue
from the squatters' perspective. One thing is clear: the squatters feel
that the war for independence is not over, and that it will never be
finished without land reform.
|