| |
Eat These Shorts
It was a surreal, comic moment. I opened the P.I. last Thursday to
see a front-page article: Bill Gates speaks to a conference of
latte-sipping software millionaires about the "digital divide." According
to adherents of the digital divide theory, bringing computers and Internet
access to every man, woman, and child on the face of the earth will
eventually end poverty and inequality as we know it. The conference
attendees were shocked when Bill Gates sat before them and stated the
obvious: "Let's be serious. Let's be serious. Do people have a clear view
of what it means to live on $1 a day? ... There are things those people
need at that level other than technology ... About 99% of the benefits of
having (a PC) come when you've provided reasonable health and literacy to
the person who's going to sit down and use it." A questioner asked
belatedly whether we should provide "technology for economic development
and watch health improve as a follow-on to that, as occurred here" (the
philosophy of the World Bank and the WTO). Instead of giving the obvious
answer ("what health improvements and for whom?"), Gates replied: "One
million people a year (in the U.S.) were not dying of measles when the
microprocessor was invented. People with elephantiasis aren't going to be
using their PCs ... It's almost criminal more money isn't spent on curing
malaria, which kills one million children a year." Evidently, someone was
listening to the World Bank, IMF, and WTO protesters. Unfortunately, Gates
still calls the murderous policies of these bodies "almost criminal"--a
vast understatement. And, naturally, he hasn't made the connection that
the same system that brought him obscene wealth has driven so many into
extreme poverty. Take Eastern Europe, for example. Since the fall of
Socialism, poverty in Eastern Europe has increased ten-fold. Over 40% of
the population lives in poverty, including 50 million children. But that's
okay, as long as someone can buy a copy of Windows in Moscow.--Maria
Tomchick
Wen Ho Lee has filed a civil law suit against the Justice
Department. Last week Janet Reno told the National Asian Pacific
American Bar Association that there would be an internal investigation
into the arrest and persecution of Wen Ho Lee. Nevertheless, her position
and the position of Energy Secretary Bill Richardson is that Justice did
nothing wrong. That's crap. Robert Vrooman, the former counterintelligence
chief at Los Alamos, where Lee worked, maintains that Lee was singled out
because he is Asian American. "Every time Lee's motive was discussed, it
came down to his ethnicity," Vrooman told a Senate panel. Meanwhile,
Pentagon investigators have been looking into high-level security breaches
involving ex-CIA Director John Deutch. Deutch, who has worked for both the
CIA and the Pentagon, did exactly what Lee did: he carried classified
information around on his personal floppy disks. While Lee has offered to
return missing computer disks, Deutch has refused to talk to Pentagon
investigators about where his floppy disks are or what he did with them.
In addition, Deutch worked on classified material at home on his computer
and then donated his old computers to schools without erasing the hard
drives.
When Pentagon experts located those computers, they were able to
retrieve a lot of Pentagon information from them. Deutch has never been
charged with a crime, much less fired, arrested, and thrown into solitary
confinement (as Wen Ho Lee was). Deutch is higher up the hierarchy than
Lee (which means the security breaches were worse in Deutch's case), but
he's also a white guy with all the privileges that a wealthy, powerful,
white guy can expect.
Even if you're a white woman, like Madeline Albright, shit won't
stick to you: recent lapses in security at the State Department--the loss
of a laptop computer with highly classified information on arms
proliferation, and the fact that six foreign service officers nominated
for ambassadorships were found to have committed a total of 62 security
infractions--have passed by without comment or punishment.--M.T.
|