| |
Backtalk
No Justice, No Surrender
ETS!,
The news just broke on this cold winter morning, no clemency for
Leonard Peltier. Clinton could not find it within himself to take a bold
action for peace and justice. Clinton goes out of office as he came into
office, just another keeper of the great white way. Though we are all
extremely disappointed that Leonard has not been freed upon this day;
still it ain't no time to surrender.
Leonard's trial was a frame-up and not an act of justice, but an act of
retaliation against a person who stood his ground for his people.
Leonard's appeals through the courts disproved the government's case
against him, but no new and fair trial was granted. A number of parole
hearings were held, but they were nothing more than continuing statements
of the government's desire for retribution. Since 1993 we have fought the
battle for Executive Clemency, only to have another door slammed in our
face; still it ain't no time for surrender.
People from around the world have struggle for justice for Leonard,
marched in the streets, signed petitions, wrote letters and organized
countless events; while the other side had their supporters, but far fewer
than Leonard. Today it has been made clear that on the level of public
will the voices of repression are more equal than the voices of justice.
One Nation under corporate rule, for the corporations, by the
corporations, with liberty and justice for the corporations solely. This
is the real manifesto of America today; still it ain't no time to
surrender. liberty and justice for the corporations solely. This is the
real manifesto
Many people have worked hard for justice for Leonard. Some now ask what
more can be done? Was this not Leonard's last chance for freedom? Is there
any point in continuing to march for a cause that seems hopeless? To this
I answer in the strongest voice that I have; Leonard Peltier is being held
in the Iron House by the hands of people; at any point those hands can set
him free. There is only hopelessness in the acts of doing nothing. As long
as the struggle continues there will always be hope; it ain't no time to
surrender.
We have fought legal battles in the courts, moral battles in parole
hearings and in the campaign for clemency. Now is the time to fight this
battle out in the public and build the will of the people to free Leonard
even stronger. Where the corporations meet we need to let them know that
the name Leonard Peltier will never go away. Where the government's
political police force, the FBI, plans their campaigns against dissent, we
should be on the outside with our banners proclaiming JUSTICE FOR LEONARD
PELTIER. Whenever the politicians go out into the public, we should be
there reminding them that they hold the keys to Leonard's prison door. The
actions of the FBI and their political bosses clearly show that they fear
Leonard and the movement to free him. For they know that with every person
who stands with Leonard another person has come out from beneath the veil
of governmental deception. The answer to freedom for Leonard Peltier is
that the people must cost the deceivers more than they are willing to pay;
it ain't no time to surrender.
I know that people are tired, depressed and more than a little angry; this
struggle has been damn hard. But we must remember that what we do is
called a struggle because it ain't easy to right the wrongs in this
society. I am not just saying this because it sounds profound. I have
worked continuously for 22 years for justice for Leonard. My children have
grown-up marching for Leonard and now my grandchildren are starting to do
the same. Time does not make this struggle any easier. Time does not make
the frustrations of having so many doors slammed in your face less
painful. Though a great wave of depression, anger and rage has swept over
me this morning, still I know in my heart; it ain't no time to surrender!
In The Spirit Of Total Resistance
Arthur J. Miller, Tacoma, WA
Whose Race?
Dear Geov,
I appreciated your article "Whose race? OUR Race!" in the Jan.
17th issue of Eat the State! Last Saturday, ACORN organized a 65-person
meeting in White Center on the utilities crisis. The meeting was conducted
in English, Spanish, and Vietnamese. Many African-American ACORN members
from our Rainier Valley chapter were in attendance. ACORN is a member-led
organization, so the meeting was chaired by a white woman and a Hispanic
woman. We followed up the meeting with an action on the homes of Council
Members Jim Compton and Margaret Pageler. We chanted in English and
Spanish as we marched down their streets. ACORN is a multi-racial
organization of people in low-income neighborhoods. I invite you to attend
an ACORN meeting some time to see that there are organizations that bring
together people of different races, ethnicities, and languages around
common issues of social and economic injustice--organizations that are run
by and for those people.
--Doug Bloch, Head Organizer, Washington ACORN
Geov,
I just read "Whose Race? OUR Race!," and it got me to thinking ... I
attended the J20 protest and march downtown this past Saturday and was
thinking the same thing while standing in the thick of my "white"
neighbors, listening to a black speaker protesting the disenfranchisement
of black voters across the country. I found the situation a bit
uncanny...I mean the (white) REI-clad, middle-aged couple next to me who
were holding "re-elect Gore" signs were nodding their heads in agreement
of the injustices that prevented blacks from voting...and of course
prevented Gore from being inaugurated that day. Why were there hardly any
black people in the crowd? Certainly all of us white people weren't there
to voice our anger over the fact that blacks are STILL being oppressed by
state and federal government agencies. I believe that most of us were
there because we are unable to pick our jaws off the floor in reaction to
the fact that Dub-yah is now our President; and so we'll agree and march
for any number of reasons that contribute to our disbelief that our
President is not who we voted for (Nader or Gore or...?). Of course
I believe that the people I marched with are genuinely interested in
racial equality, but at the same time I'm not sure we'll all see each
other at a march for yet another black man who is gunned down in our own
city by the people that protect us.
I guess I need to ask myself, "why haven't I showed up to support
those protests?" After all, me and my girlfriend live in Columbia City, 4
blocks from Rainier Vista...and we dial 911 at least three times a month to
report what some black person is doing outside our house. It's usually a
difficult call, because although we want X person to stop selling drugs in
the school playground or stop beating his girlfriend in the street, we have
seen the cops show up and
stop the first black man they come across. I did say the man
was wearing a blue and white striped jacket, but the man
wearing the Navy hooded sweatshirt (hood up) is putting his hands on the
front of a police car. So yes, I should be out there supporting a
demonstration against abusive practices resulting from rampant police
profiling practices.
I wonder what is the racial makeup of ETS's readership? Is there a black
man out there asking himself, "why didn't I show up at the J20 protest?" Am
I being naive for even asking this question? Hmmmm. Anyway, my opinion was
changed in a significant way this past Saturday ... not because of any one
speaker or any one sign or anyone...but at some point I realized that it
wasn't the Nader voters that wasted their votes (like I had believed for
the past months), but it was
me, and the others who voted for Gore that wasted their vote. I wish I
could go back to November and vote over again. Why did I vote straight
Democratic? I thought I was protecting the environment and women's choice,
but there I stood in the rain, huddled between signs condemning Bush and
praising Gore ...when the reality is that my female "Democratic" senators
are failing to represent me--neither have openly opposed the Attorney
General and Interior cabinet nominations. After a march that was so
anti-Bush/anti-Republican, it's an interesting thing that I feel equally
disgusted with the Democrats. Your articles are always fuel for thought
Geov, thanks!
Will Anderson, Seattle, WA
Editor's note: eventually both Murray and Cantwell opposed John Ashcroft
for Attorney General, but he was approved anyway, with eight Democrats
voting in his favor. Both of our state senators happily voted for Gale
Norton for Interior Secretary because Norton agreed to "consult" with them
before making any decisions about the Hanford Reach--as if that were the
only important issue for Washington residents.
G.P. comments: Thanks to all of you for your thoughtful letters. I had
hoped, in the original article, to include a (regrettably) short list of
Seattle activist groups that are doing good works in communities of color;
the new ACORN chapter is definitely on that list. Others to check
out--this is not an exhaustive list, and folks should feel free to send in
others- include: Washington Alliance for Immigrant and Refugee Justice
(WAIRJ); Community Coalition for Environmental Justice (CCEJ); NW Labor
Employment and Law Office (LELO); Black Dollar Days Task Force; Save Our
Valley; Committee to Undo Racism Everywhere (CURE); Coalition of
Anti-Racism Whites (CAR-W); People's Coalition for Justice; Leonard
Peltier Defense Committee; Jobs With Justice.
ETS! encourages comments, feedback, tips, corrections, and info! Please
keep them as concise as possible so we can print as many different voices
as possible: ETS!, P.O. Box 85541, Seattle WA 98145, or e-mail
ets@scn.org.
|