Backtalk
ETS! encourages comments, feedback, tips, corrections, and info! Please
keep them as concise as possible so we can print as many different voices
as possible: ETS!, P.O. Box 85541, Seattle WA 98145, or e-mail
ets@scn.org.
A Letter to City Officials
I had dinner at a friend's house last week. We discussed the events
surrounding the death of Aaron Roberts--from the police stop to the
protests. After a lengthy discussion, the conclusion was that we were both
confused about the entire situation...too many unanswered questions and too
many answers that didn't make sense. I am sorry to say that we left the
conversation at that--confusion--and took no action. After all, we're two
successful white men who don't have anything to do with Aaron Roberts (a
black, convicted drug felon) nor the community in which he lived.
I am ashamed to have dismissed the topic based on a mixture of lack of
interest and general confusion.
This morning I read ETS!'s coverage of the Aaron Robert's killing.
And I am angered.
I am angered because:
1) I now fully realize that I am not being told the truth about Aaron
Robert's killing.
2) This question: why am I not being told the truth?
3) The likely answer: Seattle police are murdering citizens, and then being
protected by the SPD, the major media, and elected city officials.
4) All of the above are enough to make me so angry with the leaders of this
city, that I have a depressing lack of faith in my elected officials to
stand up for the people they should be leading. I expect more. At the very
least I expect a motivation to tell the truth any time a man dies at the
hand of a city employee!
Yes, this angry e-mail is, in part, compensating for the fact that I was
too apathetic and confused to join the people protesting in the CD earlier
this month. I should have sought out answers earlier, since these answers
effect the City at large--not just black men with criminal records.
I am asking each of you for some answers...please.
1) Where can I find the official account of the moments surrounding the
killing of Aaron Roberts?
2) Is there an investigation being conducted in the moments surrounding the
killing of Aaron Roberts?
3) What is your involvement in bringing out the truth surrounding the
killing of Aaron Roberts?
I can only assume that each one of you would be both confused and angered
by the killing of Aaron Roberts, if you had been given the same
information as I have been given (P-I, Times, KING5, ETS!). So if you are
not confused and angered by the killing of Aaron Roberts then you must have
access to information that I have not (is this a safe assumption?)...if
this is the case, then please share it with me, and the rest of the city.
Thank you,
--Will Anderson, Seattle
It Wasn't 41 Bullets
To the Editor:
As I said to my friend Rick today, I'm shocked, truly shocked that our
trigger-happy police did not "murder" Mr. Davis for engaging in the felony
of stealing a police car, impersonating a police officer (mental illness,
anyone?), eluding officers, and possessing a weapon (which came with the
police vehicle) while putting the public and police at risk.
But then again, he's not African American (as his race wasn't mentioned in
the news reports, I have to presume that he is white), so why should I be
surprised?
--Keith Gormezano (who used to take pictures for a police department to
improve their public image), Seattle
Why DSHS Sucks
Geov,
After getting my state senator's assistant on the telephone with various
DSHS workers, we came to some resolve over an alleged $295 debt. After I
told one collections worker I find it hard to believe 18,000 employees of
the agency could indeed be walking on the dark side (I actually used the
word wicked) he said, "Thank you for calling." At the end of the day the
person on the other end of the line said, "Oh, you're disabled and on
Social Security? Never mind. We'll forgive the debt."
Oh really? Isn't this what you morons told me last year? Are you going to
chase me down every year to see if I've won the lottery so I can send you
$295 for whatever service you allege to have provided? I once entered a
room with a DSHS worker and had to excuse myself to call my state senator's
assistant so he could listen to her yelling. She claimed I had some sort of
hidden agenda. I said very calmly, "I am willing to forgive you if you just
tell me your medication dosage is off...or that you forgot to take them
entirely." Her supervisor made her write a letter of apology. I should have
framed it.
Rest assured these idiots will eventually chase you down for an alleged
overpayment. No matter how many times you alert them of your employment
status or other information, they always screw it up. You have to
understand these people. They like to be trapped in cubicles with
voluminous regulations. The blinking of florescent lighting has done
something detrimental to their brain chemistry. To cope they shove papers
into a shredder and therefore lose track of who is working or who their
clients are entirely. They don't even care. They are counting down the days
with paper clip chain links shaped into gravestone markers. These people
needn't fear death. They are dead. I think that's written in their
policy operations manual, or POMS as they like to call it. I may be
chronically ill, but on good days I get to sniff the fresh air while DSHS
workers are imprisoned between four cloth-covered walls.
I don't get these people. I mean really. During my tenure with a Department
of Social and Health Services branch a supervisor sent out an e-mail
telling whoever was putting ketchup packets under the toilet seats to knock
it off. "There's a job at McDonald's for whoever is doing this," he wrote.
The absurdity of this note is the implication that working at any fast food
establishment is more demeaning than working for DSHS. I arrived at work
each morning to the alcohol soaked breath of the man sitting next to me.
"This job sucks," he'd say. Then he'd spend the next few hours reading the
newspaper. I tolerated listening to the man with the newborn infant talk to
his wife at least a half dozen times a day about breast feeding and infant
sleeping patterns. There's a reason I chose not to breed and I don't want
to experience it by proxy either, but most annoying is that this is at
taxpayer expense.
The person in the office who just last year completed a court ordered
course in a sex offenders' treatment program was quite blatant in his
disgust over the size of actress Kate Winslett's breasts. "They're just
huge, aren't they?" he said staring at my chest. I was suddenly very
self-conscious and quite frankly, didn't care to know what an acceptable
breast size was to him. One employee offered to have her boyfriend beat up
anyone who bothered me in the office. One catch. Her boyfriend is in jail.
I thanked her, but declined the offer.
Another employee accidentally sent a message to the entire staff about
another employee's underwear. It didn't just show up in the in boxes, but
literally flashed across the screen. During the holidays, a non-Christian
employee was viciously attacked by a member of the unofficial office morale
squad for not putting up decorations. And never in my life have I seen an
office engage in a month long fight over the contents of a snack machine.
DSHS is the epitome of dysfunction. These people don't need raises, they
need psychiatrists.
--Name withheld by request, Seattle
|