| |
Backtalk
ETS! encourages comments, feedback, tips, corrections, and info! Please
keep them as concise as possible so we can print as many different voices
as possible: ETS!, P.O. Box 85541, Seattle WA 98145, or e-mail
ets@scn.org.
Signs of Peace
Editors,
On Sunday, October 7, 2001 when I heard the United States had begun
bombing Afganistan, I decided to do something about it.
I found a small poster with the sentence "All People are Welcome Here" in
English and 17 other languages. It's a very beautiful sign and I made 100
copies on yellow paper. Then, I walked along Broadway on Capitol Hill and
handed them out for the businesses to post them in their windows.
The signs were designed and created by a group of friends from Harborview.
The reaction by shopowners and their employees was mixed: everything from
"We are a corporation and our corporate policy is that we can't put
anything in our windows" to "Thanks, can I have two?" The most
interesting responses were those people who saw their own language in the
poster first. One or two stores said: "No thanks, we assume everyone knows
that all people are welcome here!" which I found to be an elegant
response.
After four hours of visiting stores and talking to shop owners and
workers, I decided to call it a day and handed out my remaining signs to
people on the street. I noted that a few more businesses had already put
these signs in their windows and that made me smile as I was leaving for
Beacon Hill.
On another note, I posted a long article to my friends and family with the
title: "If this is Patriotism, Keep it!" or something to that effect.
This has stirred up my various e-mail lists and a number of friends have
written to me in protest--that it is a good thing that we bomb
Afganistan. It's giving me a chance to discuss the events with them, which
I appreciate. Thanks to you who are taking the time to think about what
this all means and for talking to people you know about it.
Albert Kaufman, Seattle
Tiny Hand Prints
The place in Uzbekistan where the US is marshaling its forces is called
Tashkent. It's a two thousand-year-old city that was a central stop on the
famous Silk Road trading route. Nowadays it's a bristling metropolis of
two million people, give or take several thousand American soldiers.
Tashkent is also one of Seattle's sister cities. In fact, the little park
up the street from me is called Tashkent Park in honor of this
partnership. The park was created when Tashkent was still part of the USSR
and its centerpiece is a brick courtyard and planter adorned with ceramic
tiles made by the children of my sister city. The simple images of our
Earth, smiling faces, or the word MIR (Russian for Peace) mean a lot more
to me now than they ever have before.
The children that made those tiles are adults now and are living at this
month's Ground Zero. I see each tile and touch it, wanting to know the
history of its creator and how they are doing now. Do they still harbor
the same hopes and dreams that they did before? Do they know that while
surrounded by thousands of American strangers in their own city that an
American stranger is in his own city thinking of them? Do they still
believe in peace and unity?
As I trace my finger along the outline of their own fingertips I want to
reach out to each one of them and take their hands. Grasping them firmly
with friendship and love. For all people and all eternity.
Best,
Curtis Linderman, Seattle
Come vote on Bainbridge! We've got better candidates
Every Election we hope we are going to make a difference. Sometimes we
can. We have had, and will continue to have a developer-styled government
on Bainbridge unless we get a majority of community, environment, and
pedestrian friendly candidates elected. Please talk to friends, e-mail,
call, and write on behalf of Debby Vancil, Debby Vann, Bill Knobloch, and
Darlene Kordonowy.
A bare majority for policies to do the "most good, for the most people,
all the time" is possible now. This "most good" line (an old saw of
civics) has on Bainbridge always taken a back seat to "We're just trying
to make a little money here."
Our City ordinances are looked at as to their profitability and changed to
meet that goal! I'm not arguing against people building things, or making
money. I am arguing that people can and will build things and make money
without the taxpayer providing most of the infrastructure free, and
without a peep from Council after Council. If these things were discussed
openly and in enough detail, I might find out I'm wrong and people just
love paying 80% of development fees for developers. Without a Council that
even sees these things as worth having on the agenda, what is there to do?
All four candidates--Debby Vann, Debby Vancil, Bill Knobloch, and Darlene
Kordonowy--are exemplary. Their policies are community friendly, and they
have worked for years to prepare to take on a City that is driven to help
development and sacrifice our Comprehensive Plan, environmental basics,
and communities.
Don't let personal evaluations of any of these distract from policies that
you will need them to change in your favor. Too much is made of the
personal. Let's go for policy.
I bring up personality, because I hear people talk about this or that
candidate not being "a consensus maker" or being "too confrontative". It's
not true. Any of you who have dealt with the City long enough to see what
goes on, will have traded etiquette for confrontation, if you care about
Bainbridge. Money, not people's best values, drives decisions. Rooting this
out isn't for the timid.
Where are the farms, trails, and "alternatives to single occupancy
Vehicles," salmon restoration projects, historic preservation, etc. that
the Comprehensive Plan and survey after survey have called the City to do?
This is a watershed election. Please vote and vote for these four.
Jeff Moore, Bainbridge
|