Volume 6, #15 March 13, 2002 POLITICS WITH BITE! CONTACT HELP previous BACK ISSUES next
A FORUM FOR ANTI-AUTHORITARIAN POLITICAL OPINION, RESEARCH AND HUMOR

Backtalk



ETS! encourages comments, feedback, tips, corrections, and info! Please keep them as concise as possible so we can print as many different voices as possible: ETS!, P.O. Box 85541, Seattle WA 98145, or e-mail ets@scn.org.

Likes Our Words

Sir,

Trevor Baumgartner's article "My Mother's Son," published in your January 2nd issue, reflects insight and courage. It is not easy, these days, to mention occupation by its real name.

Congratulations to Baumgartner for his honesty, but also for the choice of the deeply touching title "My Mother's Son," reminiscent of the Kinks' "Some Mother's Son," an anti-war song. It is a good reminder that what is happening in Palestinian Occupied Territories amounts to a war declared on Palestinians by an occupier state. It also reinstates Palestinians as mere human beings--something the official media seems to forget.

Regards,

--Jamil Farah, Paris, France

Doesn't Like Our Words

Editor, ETS!,

Your Eat the State! masthead contains some language that is offensive to an old feminist like me. I am as outrageous as anyone, but I resent the term "fucking" used at every turn. Fuck is an outmoded term, mostly used as a putdown, but which represents an act that I deem sacred--the act of intercourse. Why should the act of intercourse be a dirty word and thrown around at every turn just for shock value? It was started by men who often consider women as beneath them in status and intercourse with women as a power kick.

Get off this outmoded usage. Why not think up some interesting terms that represent true creativity without having to overuse the male putdowns from the past? You can do it! Try it! You'll like it!

--Georgie Bright Kunkel, Seattle

How Times Change

ETS!,

The wraith of Jefferson popped up Feb. 7 at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, DC. Looking glum throughout the prandial affair, the former president afterwards e-mailed John Adams. Sadly, the message (below) bounced:

Dear Sir,

I accede to your uncanny powers of prognostication. Science did not, as I had predicted, liberate the minds of men from rank superstition and ecclesiastical imposition. In 2002, I find, to my chagrin, priestly dogma infects the highest levels of American government. The president, one George W. Bush, doubles as priest-in-chief of a Holy American Empire.

At a "prayer breakfast" attended by foreign dignitaries, congressmen, and prominent clerics, Mr. Bush urged the populace to turn to prayer midst a national crisis precipitated by a conclave of Mohammedan saboteurs. Not to Reason, I say, but to prayer! Recent events had put him, he said, "on bended knee."

Was he, sir, petitioning a despot swayed by servility? Does the potentate favor the most obsequious groveler? Is the Creator, who endowed us with intelligence, freedom, and liberty, actuated by vanity rather than justice?

Like an avatar of the Bishop of Hippo, the priest-president extolled faith. He asseverated that faith empowers, faith abides, faith surmounts every obstacle. Unfortunately, his eminence didn't clarify the efficient mechanism by which faith effects its preternatural marvels. I opined, sir, that faith works in tandem with groveling.

Faith seems to jostle with fiscal policy. "Faith," Mr. Bush averred, "shows us the way to self-giving, to love our neighbors as we would want to be loved. It teaches us never to target the innocent."

Now, Mr. Bush purports to admire Jesus Christ. One might therefore expect Mr. Bush to conform schemes of taxation to Jesuine ethics. The historical Jesus, sifted from the mythic Christ of triune humbuggery, threatened mammon with eternal damnation. He unremittingly contemned Dives. The Galilean, sir, was a paladin for the destitute, the downtrodden, the impecunious hoi polloi.

Does our people's president, then, fetter patricians with adamantine taxation? "Indeed, he must," you will say. "He would otherwise be impugned as deficient in rectitude."

Well, sir, hear and perpend: The pious Mr. Bush proposes a $2 trillion tax cut, 43 percent of which goes to the wealthiest one percent of the populace!

And yet, sir, so has the popular mind prostituted itself to mummeries of piety, Mr. Bush passes for an humble and sincere Christian!

With kindly regards and best wishes,

As ever your humble and obedient, etc.,

--Thomas Jefferson, as forwarded by Gary Sloan



subscribe / donate / tiny print / guidelines for writers / help / index

© 2002 Eat the State! All rights reserved.