| |
"Democracy" In Iraq:
by Maria Tomchick
Sheiks and Swindlers
Now that Iraq has been thoroughly looted, and its history pillaged and
burned, the Pentagon has commenced the task of replacing the old regime
with a new one. Unfortunately, the new regime could end up looking very
much like the old one.
The Bush administration's first initiative--to re-appoint mid-level members
of the Baath Party to act as the mayors and civil servants of Iraq's
cities, has so far failed, most notably in Basra.
Two weeks ago, as the British finally "secured" Basra, they appointed a
local sheik to run the city. At first they refused to release his name, to
the chagrin of the British press who dubbed him "the secret sheik."
Residents of Basra, however, were not mollified and demanded to know his
name, which the British eventually divulged: Sheik Muzahim Mustafa Kanan
Tameemi.
Tameemi, it turns out, was more than just a local sheik. He was a brigadier
general in Saddam's military and a former Baath Party member.
Demonstrations erupted immediately. How could the British put a former
Baathist in charge? They pointed out that it was an insult to them as an
educated people to have a tribal sheik ruling over them. They wanted to
choose their own mayor.
A large, hostile group gathered outside Tameemi's home and threw stones at
his family, while another group marched through the poor section of the
city, demanding an Islamic government. The British backpedaled and replaced
Tameemi with a wealthy local businessman, a man named Ghalib Kubba. The
protests, however, have continued--after all, how could a businessman grow
so wealthy under Saddam Hussein without having ties to the Baath Party or
Saddam himself?
Then came the Najaf fiasco. A exiled Iraqi named Abdul Majid al-Khoei had
been traveling with US troops, working as a translator and liaison to local
people in southern Iraq. Al-Khoei was the son of a prominent Iraqi Shiite
cleric who died under house arrest in Najaf in 1992. Having lived in
Britain for twelve years, al-Khoei became a friend of Tony Blair and Jack
Straw. Al-Khoei was earmarked as an Iraqi exile leader who would play a key
role in forming the new government in Iraq.
Al-Khoei shucked his military escort and went to Najaf to help settle a
dispute between the former Baath Party leader of the local mosque, Haider
al-Kadar, and some armed members of the al-Sadr family (Mohammed Braga
al-Sadr was a prominent Shiite cleric murdered by Saddam Hussein during the
Shiite uprising after the Persian Gulf War in 1991). Al-Khoei met with
al-Kadar first, then suggested that they go and make peace with the al-Sadr
supporters. It's unclear how the fighting started, but both men, al-Kadar
and al-Khoei were eventually hacked to death with swords and knives. Many
onlookers said that the crowd was so angry at the attempt to reinstall the
hated al-Kadar in the holy shrine that they cut him into little pieces.
Al-Khoei, it appears, was killed either because he was viewed as an
American puppet attempting to supplant the local successor to al-Sadr, or
because he was supporting a member of Saddam Hussein's Baath Party.
Certainly, anti-Baathist feeling runs high among a populace that has lost
many of its spiritual leaders to Saddam's purges. Iraqi Shiites were never
allowed to openly worship or celebrate their religious holidays. The past
two weeks in Iraq have been remarkable--among Sunni as well as Shiite
people--for the blossoming of public religious practice and attendance at
mosques. And at most mosques, religious leaders are telling their people
the same things: they must choose their own leaders, they must make the
Americans leave as soon as possible, and they must have an Islamic state.
It's that last injunction that has the Bush administration worried. Iraqi
Shiites have a religious connection to the largely Shiite population of
Iran, Iraq's eastern neighbor. There are political connections to Iran's
fundamentalist government, too. One of the largest Shiite groups is the
Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI), which has ties
to Iran's military, and who agitates for a fundamentalist Islamic state.
Just this past week, 30 armed men from SCIRI took over the town hall
building in Kut and gradually, firmly, and persistently took over the
running of the city from the US marines stationed there. The marine
commander even considered assassinating the SCIRI's self-appointed mayor,
but refrained when he saw that everyone in the city was kowtowing and
deferring to the man. Killing him would have provoked a riot.
Meanwhile, on Tuesday, April 15, the US military held the first of a series
of town meetings at an airbase near Ur to select community representatives.
The operative term here is "select," with the emphasis on who's doing the
choosing: United States envoys. Notably, most of the prominent Shiite
clerics throughout southern Iraq boycotted the meeting. Only one Shiite
cleric attended, a man named Sheik Ayad Jamal al-Din. The US envoys likes
al-Din because he's the only Shiite religious leader they could find who'll
argue for a secular state.
At the same time, in nearby Nasiriyah, at least 5,000 Iraqis protested in
the streets on Tuesday, carrying signs that read, "No one represents us in
the conference." Certainly, they had a point: the conference was heavily
dominated by US-funded Iraqi exiles, while the rest of the delegates were
carefully hand-picked and pre-screened by US envoys. On Wednesday, the
protests in Nasiriyah had grown to 20,000 people, and the unrest had spread
to Baghdad, where several hundred people had gathered outside the heavily
garrisoned Palestine Hotel, chanting, "Down, down USA--don't stay, go
away!"
By Friday, the first day that most Iraqis had been able to attend a full
prayer service since Saddam Hussein had come to power, the mosques all over
the country were packed. The mullahs mixed religion and politics, lecturing
against the US occupiers and for a multi-ethnic, Islamic state. When
morning prayers ended, people poured out into the streets of Baghdad. The
US press reported thousands of demonstrators, while the wire services said
there were tens of thousands of people in the streets. Al Jazeera and some
reporters on the scene put the number in the range of 50,000 to 100,000
people. The demonstrators carried banners that read: "No to America, No to
Secular State, Yes to Islamic State," while organizers called for
cooperation between Sunnis and Shiites in rejecting US efforts to impose
Iraqi exiles as leaders of a new Iraq.
Certainly not every Iraqi wants an Islamic state, but the US has made no
overtures to the members of Iraq's educated classes. In fact, the US
military seems to be interested in only those Iraqi academics, scientists,
and businessmen who might know something about Saddam's weapons of mass
destruction program. Geologists and technicians to help jump-start oil
production are also in high demand, but the US military is not recruiting
anyone to form a constitutional assembly, set up local caucuses, register
political parties, or draw up voter lists.
Instead, the Pentagon has put its backing behind one man. On the same day
as the massive Baghdad protest, US troops chauffeured Iraqi exile Ahmad
Chalabi into the capital city, where he set up his headquarters in a social
club formerly frequented by Saddam's sons. Chalabi is obviously the
Pentagon's choice for the next President of Iraq, although both the CIA and
the State Department loathe the man. Chalabi is a criminal. Convicted in
absentia for bank fraud in Jordan, he would have to serve 22 years in
prison if he were ever extradited to Jordan. In addition, Swiss authorities
have prosecuted two of his brothers on similar charges. Chalabi is also
widely detested by other Iraqi exiles, has no constituency inside or
outside of Iraq, and shows no ability to unite other Iraqi leaders, much
less the multi-ethnic Iraqi people.
In addition, the CIA and the State Department may fear what seems obvious
to everyone else: that Chalabi will become the type of President-for-life
that the US has helped to install in other Third World nations. He's a man
who's very Saddam-like, and his legacy will be much the same: rigged
elections, numerous human rights abuses, and a plundered public treasury.
Ominously, Chalabi is already short-circuiting the efforts of US envoys
with their stage-managed town meetings. He has announced that he will
invite the leaders of four other groups to meet with him in Baghdad to form
a five-member Iraqi Leadership Council. The other four groups are SCIRI,
Iraqi National Accord (prominent Iraqi exiles, just like Chalabi's group),
and the two main Kurdish groups, the PUK and the DK. No local Iraqi leaders
need apply.
Chalabi has also turned his attention to hiring his own armed militia
members, presumably to be paid with his ill-gotten wealth (although there
is undoubtedly a few million dollars in Pentagon funds rattling around in
his coffers, too).
Meanwhile, other thieves are riding on the coattails of US troops. Much of
the recent violence in the northern city of Mosul can be explained by the
US installing Mishaan al-Juburi as the new mayor of Mosul. When al-Juburi
attempted to give a public speech exhorting Mosul residents to support US
troops, the crowd called him a liar and pelted him with stones, whereupon
US troops opened fired on the crowd, killing at least 15 people and
injuring more than 60. Members of the al-Juburi tribe have told Al Jazeera
TV that Mishaan is a gangster and has no support among the residents of
either Mosul or the surrounding area.
In the chaos and power vacuum that follows war and the downfall of a
regime, armed gangs, warlords, and mafioso soon take over. This was true in
a number of former Soviet republics, in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in Kosovo,
and in Afghanistan. In Iraq, however, the US military is actively
supporting the ascendancy of warlords and mafioso, and favoring one
strongman--Ahmad Chalabi--to lead them all.
Some of the sources for this article:
"Sheik's Appointment by British Triggers Protests and Accusations," Susan
Glasser, Washington Post, 4/11/03, A29, www.washingtonpost.com
"A Dust-Up in Basra's Leadership Vacuum," Robyn Dixon, Los Angeles Times,
4/18/03, www.latimes.com
"The Shia of Najaf seethe ominously, fearing the yoke of US occupation,"
Phil Reeves, The Independent, news.independent.co.uk
"Murdered in a mosque: the cleric who went home to act as a peacemaker,"
Cahal Milmo, The Independent, 4/11/03
"Shiite Power Struggle Threatens Stability," Yaroslav Trofimov, Wall Street
Journal, 4/17/03, A10
"Free to Protest, Iraqis Complain About the US," Ian Fisher, New York
Times, 4/16/03, www.nytimes.com
"First glimpse of Iraq's new power brokers," Peter Grier and Ben Arnoldy,
Christian Science Monitor, 4/16/03,
www.csmonitor.com/2003/0416/p01s04-woiq.htm
"5,000 march to have say on future of Iraq," Marcella Bombardieri, Boston
Globe, 4/16/03, www.boston.com
"Baghdad Residents Protest US Troops," Ellen Knickmeyer, Associated Press,
4/18/03
"Dilip Hiro: Can Iraq be held together now Saddam is gone?" The
Independent, 4/11/03
"Self-proclaimed rulers emerge in Iraq," Al Jazeera, english.aljazeera.net;
"US admits Mosul killings," BBC online, 4/16/03,
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2951789.stm
"Mosul residents tiring of US presence," Odai Sirri, Al Jazeera,
4/17/03
|