| |
Our Other War
by Geov Parrish
Remember Afghanistan?
It was in the news again last week, briefly, when former NFL football
player Pat Tillman was killed in a firefight there. But Tillmans death,
however heroically portrayed, told us nothing about what's actually been
happening in that troubled land.
No news has been bad news.
April was perhaps the worst month for the US forces and the fledgling
Karzai government since the US and its rapacious Northern Alliance
allies
overran Kabul and took control of the country two and a half years ago.
At
that point, Osama bin Laden was the most wanted man in the world, "dead
or
alive," as Dubya told us. And the noble cause of replacing the religious
dictatorship of the Taliban with peace and a flowering new democracy was
the grand cause of the day. This time, George Bush told us, we wouldn't
just cut and run. We'd stay the course in Afghanistan. We wouldn't
forget.
Well, we did forget, of course--almost immediately. Bush neglected to
put
any money for Afghanistan aid in his next year's budget request,
and
the pledge that the brutal warlords who made up the Northern Alliance
wouldn't have a seat at the table of the new government was quickly
forgotten. At the loya jurga in 2002 that was supposed to be an
open
council of Afghan elders, but was instead a carefully orchestrated
Washington show, CIA man Hamid Karzai was coronated as president, and
all
the evil old warlords were honored front row guests.
Fast forward two years, and the warlords, not Karzai, are now running
most
of the country. Their power is so great that militias of the most
notorious
and powerful, General Dostum, ran off the governors in two separate
provincial capitals earlier this month. Dostum, the man whose forces
were
accused of leaving Taliban prisoners to suffocate in crates in 2001,
and of
mass rape and murder in the early '90s, controls Mazir-e-Sharif and
much of
the north of the country. Another warlord controls much of the west. In
the
east and south, along the mountainous border with Pakistan where Tillman
was killed, the Taliban is resurgent and controls many of the rural
villages and towns. Pro-Taliban violence has in recent months spread
from
those outlying areas to Kandihar and other cities. Really, the only
part of
Afghanistan Karzai's government controls is the capital city of Kabul,
and
that only during daylight hours.
How are the warlords maintaining control? With money, and the money is
coming from drugs. We also learned this month that Afghanistan supplied
a
staggering 80 percent of the world's poppy harvest last year, after the
trade had been virtually eradicated under the Taliban. Given that the US
has a long history of dealing with thugs, and the CIA of dealing with
drug
money, it's hard to believe we don't have some of our own sticky hands
in
this mess as well. But that's no help to the soldiers still deployed in
our
forgotten war.
Why, exactly, are we fighting in Afghanistan? Why, to hunt down Al-Qaeda
and Taliban "remnants," though it's not clear why it should have been an
offense to be part of the Taliban, Afghanistan's governing party three
years ago and an entity that, while brutal, was never at war with
America.
In any event, these are no longer "remnants"--after two years in which
war-weary Afghans have seen no real improvement in their lives (sound
familiar?), the Taliban is stronger today than it was in 2002. When the
Taliban retreated to the mountains in the winter of 2001-02, it was with
the pledge that they were going to regroup and reemerge, not go away,
and
that while invaders come and go, they would stay.
So far, they've held to their word. US soldiers, spread thin by the much
larger war being fought in Iraq, are either trapped on their bases
trying
to avoid the cross-fire between competing militias, or engaged in
fruitless
searches of the rural mountains, walking into ambushes--like the one
that
killed Tillman--from an enemy that knows the terrain far better.
Then there's Pakistan, our valued military partner in the hunt for
Al-Qaeda
and Taliban fugitives, and as dubious a partner as one could hope for.
In
embracing Pakistan after 9-11, the Bush Administration dropped economic
sanctions put in place to penalize Pakistan for its nuclear program, and
earlier this year it emerged that scientists under the Musharraf
dictatorship have also been the primary source of the nuclear materials
obtained by Libya, Iran, and North Korea. In other words, while we spent
billions invading on the pretext of hunting down phantom weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq, the real menace on this score is an ally we're
arming
and funneling countless additional millions to on our second war front.
Last month, Pakistan gave us yet another reminder of who we're dealing
with: an operation in the tribal hinterlands along the Afghan border
that
was breathlessly announced as having cornered a "high value target"
--presumably one of bin Laden's countless #2 men. But the fugitive
escaped,
and it later emerged that the "Al-Qaeda operatives" and "foreign
terrorists" captured were largely former mujahadeen from the Soviet
wars in
the early '80s who'd come, intermarried with local tribeswomen, and
stayed.
Most of the dead weren't foreign fighters at all--they were tribespeople
cynically killed by Musharraf's army so as to have bodies to show off.
That's our boys.
How long will we be in Afghanistan? Indefinitely, it appears, because
the
"remnants" we're seeking are people who live there, and as the security
situation degenerates and the lot of most Afghans--including most
women--remains relentlessly grim, our presence will become more and more
resented. Meanwhile, drug profits are buying more and more guns for the
steadily growing warlord militias. As with Iraq, we took a bad situation
and seem on the verge of having turned ourselves into targets and the
country into a full-blown state of civil war.
It's one more war where it's not clear why we're there, what the
objective
is, or how well know if we've ever won. All that's clear is that while
war
criminals like Dostum enjoy a new prosperity and power, soldiers like
Tillman--and the vast majority of Afghans--are continuing to lose.
|