Risky Business: US Borrowing And Foreign Lending
by Seth Sandronsky
The American public may not know it, but the US economy would be up a steep
creek without foreign lenders. They help to fund the federal government's
deficit spending, projected to reach $475 billion, or 4.3 percent of
economic output, next year.
Foreign investors buy Treasury bonds to allow the federal government to
spend more than it collects in taxes, which President Bush and Congress
have cut three times in three years. The sharp increase in war spending for
the Iraq occupation has also increased the red ink.
Against that backdrop, Treasury Secretary John Snow recently traveled to
Asia, where he did not persuade China's leaders to change the dollar-peg of
the Chinese currency, the renminbi. A more expensive renminbi would boost
the price of Chinese exports, and make US exports lower-priced by
comparison.
Snow's trip to Asia was partly a ploy to publicly address the rising tide
of unemployment in the American manufacturing sector. It has been in a
job-loss mode since Bush arrived in Washington DC.
Some 44,000 US factory workers lost their jobs in August, according to data
from the Labor Department. The national economy dropped a total of 93,000
jobs last month.
Moreover, workers who remain employed are being squeezed to produce more.
The productivity of American workers rose at a 6.8 percent annual rate
during the second quarter of 2003, the biggest jump in 15 months.
Finding paid work is not getting easier. US employers cut 170,000 jobs in
the April-to-June period.
That is why Bush wants workers who vote to see him as taking bold action to
reverse the nation's shrinking payrolls, especially in the industrial
heartland. Cheap Chinese exports are easy to blame for America's job-loss
economy.
Case in point is the president's remarks on Labor Day that US firms
producing in America are hurting. He urged more market fairness for
American manufacturers, but was mum on US firms producing in China and
exporting to America.
As Snow and Bush learned, Chinese leadership has no reason to remove the
renminbi's dollar-peg. That would raise the price of China's exports, slow
growth, and increase unemployment.
Moreover, such a currency appreciation would also cut China's trade surplus
with the US. With that surplus, China's central bank invests in US
government bonds.
Apparently, Bush wants China to reduce its export earnings. But such a
policy is creating the financial conditions to slash overseas investment
flows to the US.
Foreign ownership of Treasury debt has risen from one-fifth in 1995 to
one-third today, the Financial Times of September 8 reported, citing
Merrill Lynch as a source. This is part of the backdrop to the sell-off in
the US bond market that began in mid-June.
A front-page article in the same edition of the Financial Times
looked at the chance that Asian investors might lose their enthusiasm for
lending to the US. Indications of this shift could include "recent sharp
falls in the price of US government debt."
Surely the rising federal deficit is making overseas investors queasy. Also
making them nervous is the US trade deficit that requires annual borrowing
of nearly $550 billion, or $1.5 billion each day.
The security of the dollar, the world's main currency, flows from the power
of America's armed forces. But all the military strength in the world
cannot hide the fact from foreign lenders that the US is piling up public
and private debt at a fever pitch.
"At the current rate of borrowing, the net indebtedness of the United
States will exceed the value of the stock market by 2018 and the combined
value of the stock market and housing stock by 2032," economist Dean Baker
recently wrote.
How much longer can the American economy keep going deeper into debt that
is financed by foreigners? The answer to the question may arrive sooner
than later.
One thing is certain. We have not heard the last word from the emerging
"crisis of confidence" concerning foreign creditors and American debtors.
--Seth Sandronsky is a member of Sacramento Area Peace Action and
co-editor of Because People Matter, Sacramento's progressive newspaper.
|