| |
Saddam's In Custody. Now What?
by Peter Graff
"Ladies and gentlemen, we got him," Bush said, barely able to conceal the
glee of knowing that from that point forth, the media would be saturated
with images of a bedraggled Hussein emerging from his "spider hole," paeans
to our freer, safer world sung endlessly from the punditry chorus. The
simplistic teamroller of good/evil would once again roll roughshod over any
attempts at eal dialog about the country we've invaded and now occupy. For
now, none of the ugly details matter. Americans and Iraqis and freedom
lovers everywhere can sleep better at night, no longer having to fret over
phantoms of Baathist butchers skulking in the dark corners of their
liberty.
CNN and MSNBC and of course FOX all proclaimed Bush's "big victory," and a
haggard bearded Hussein was flashed on the screen over and over, just in
case, during those intermittent seconds, we may have forgotten that the
forces of billion dollar benevolent bombs and sarcastic contempt for
international law have in fact eradicated another manifestation of infinite
evil.
But now it gets interesting. Unlike Saddam's sons Qusay and Uday,
trial-free Old West gunslinging justice wasn't meted out on the spot.
Saddam surrendered without a fight. With the world watching, the Bush
administration will have to afford the fallen dictator some semblance of
due process, something the murky rule book for their war on terror finds
rather loathsome. Saddam will have to be put on trial, and with that trial,
the inconvenient history of our often illegal support for Saddam will have
to be trotted out, this time not just from the treasonous America-hating
left. "Blowback" may just work itself into the post-Saddam lexicon of
mainstream discussions on American foreign policy. Maybe.
Already, Bush is speaking of Hussein's execution, reminding the cameras of
Saddam's brutality, his rapes, his tortures, and his general willingness to
wreak havoc on his own people. Again, the language of absolutes rarely
tells the entire story. Saddam's rise to power and his unquestionable
brutality, unfortunately for Bush, don't exist in an easy to sell package
wrapped only in black and white.
Now that he's in custody, many on the right will no doubt herald the coming
end of Iraqi resistance. Indeed, when framed inside the narrow confines of
evildoers wanting to see Saddam's return, the insurgency against American
occupation seems to have taken a fatal blow. But again, the resistance is
much more complex. Despite the tempting images of a Middle Eastern Lex
Luthor laughing diabolically from inside his secret hideout, Saddam most
probably wasn't issuing a steady stream of strategic communiques from his
dank arachnid cubby hole.
The Baathists form one component of the resistance to American troops, not
its whole. Lest we forget, we invaded and occupied this country in
contravention of international law and on a false set of accusations.
Despite what is being trumpeted on the tube, WMDs and the threat they posed
to our nation were the original reasons for going to war, not to wave our
benevolent freedom and democracy wand over the oppressed. The resistance to
being occupied will continue, regardless of Saddam's trial.
And of course, Saddam should be put on trial. The Iraqi people who suffered
under his brutal thumb deserve as much. They deserve an example of due
process, and they deserve complete candor about the US/Iraq relations that
often played a contributing role in that suffering. Most of all, after all
these years of hardship, they simply deserve justice.
Our job now is to remain focused. Our job is to continue the struggle to
elevate the discourse on Iraq, to keep pushing back the confining walls of
debate and awareness, especially now, when they will undoubtedly be
buttressed with another round of good guys/bad guys simplicity. We must
remember, and remind those who will listen, that we are still occupying
another country, one which we attacked despite worldwide and UN objection.
Even though the networks are loathe to do it, we must work to supply
context and nuance, to get people thinking beyond the scenario of a
white-hatted sheriff finally putting Black Bart behind bars, then urging
the citizens to quit thinking scary thoughts and head down to the saloon to
celebrate.
--Peter Graff is a Seattle-based freelance writer, producer, and
activist.
|