Nature & Politics
by Jeffrey St. Clair
Faith-Based Parks: Pray to Play
The view from the south rim of the Grand Canyon, smogged up as it is these
days, has prompted even the most secular of visitors to transcendentalist
reveries as they cast their eyes toward Shiva's Temple and Wotan's Throne.
Now tourists at the federal park in northern Arizona will be greeted with
scriptural passages affixed to park signs to help interpret the religious
experience of gazing into God's mighty chasm.
This fall Donald Murphy, deputy director of the National Park Service,
ordered three bronze plaques featuring quotes from Psalms 68:4, 66:4, and
104:24 placed on viewing platforms on the south rim of the Canyon. The
plaques were made and donated by the Evangelical Sisterhood of Mary in
Phoenix, who live in a convent called Cannan in the Desert. The convent was
founded in 1963 by Mother Basilea, who visited the Sinai where it is said
she conversed with the Supreme Deity about the moral decline of the western
world.
The nuns' website warns that "an avalanche of moral decay is upon us...our
society is disintegrating." As evidence, the nuns point to the removal of
Judge Roy Moore's monument to the Ten Commandments in the lobby of the
Alabama Supreme Court and to the appearance of the Dalai Lama at the
National Cathedral--"another illustration of how God's commandments are
pushed aside, step by step. May Jesus help us and guard our hearts!"
At the urging of the sisters, Murphy overturned a decision to ban the
plaques by the Park's superintendent, who contended the religious messages
violated the US Constitution.
That's not all. Now, after soaking in the grandeur of the canyon, visitors
can retire to the park bookstore where they can browse through the diaries
of John Wesley Powell, Edward Abbey's Down the River, historian Stephen
Pyne's excellent How the Canyon Became Grand, and numerous volumes on the
geology of the canyon. After all, the Grand Canyon has long been viewed as
a kind of living encyclopedia of geological forces, a layered history of
the Earth that debunked fundamentalist dogma on the age of the earth.
"Nowhere on the earth's surface, so far as we know, are the secrets of its
structure revealed as here," wrote the great American geologist John Strong
Newberry.
But starting this summer the park's bookstore began offering a volume
titled The Grand Canyon: a Different View. The view is indeed different.
This book of lavish photographs and essays presents the creationist account
of the origins of the great canyon of the Colorado River. The book is
edited by Tom Vail, a river guide, who offers Christian float trips through
the canyon. "For years, as a Colorado River guide I told people how the
Grand Canyon was formed over the evolutionary time scale of millions of
years," Vail writes in the introduction to the book. "Then I met the Lord.
Now, I have a different view" of the Canyon, which, according to a biblical
time scale, "can't possibly be more than about a few thousand years old."
One of the contributors is creation "scientist" Dr. Gary Parker who
observes: "Where did the Grand Canyon itself come from? The Flood may have
stacked the rock like a giant layer cake, but what cut the cake? One thing
is sure: the Colorado River did not do it."
Earlier this year, the Bush administration prevented park rangers from
publishing a rebuttal to the book for use by interpretive staff and
seasonal employees who are often confronted during tours by creationist
zealots.
In southern California, a similar battle is raging over a Latin cross
erected on the Sunrise Rocks in the Mojave National Preserve. Apparently,
the cross was erected by the Veterans of Foreign Wars and has since become
a site for sunrise Easter services and a meeting ground for Wise-Use
ranchers associated with the Christian Identity movement.
In December 2000, Park Service managers agreed to remove the cross based on
advice from the Justice Department that the icon violated the Constitution
and Park Service regulations. But the Park Service backed down after
Congressman Jerry Lewis, the right-wing firebrand from San Diego,
intervened. The ACLU sued the Park Service in March of 2001 and won an
injunction. The Bush Administration appealed and the case remains pending
before the Ninth Circuit.
Meanwhile, in the nation's capital the Park Service has bowed to pressure
from the religious right to rewrite the history of protests on the national
mall. Since 1995, the interpretive center at the Lincoln Memorial in
Washington has shown an eight-minute-long film depicting various
demonstrations and gatherings at the monument, including anti-war protests,
concerts, and Martin Luther King's most famous speech. Last month, the Park
Service caved in to demands from Christian groups to edit out footage of
anti-Vietnam War protests and images of gay rights and pro-choice
demonstrations. In a letter to the Park Service, the Christian groups
charged that the film implied that "Lincoln would have supported homosexual
and abortion 'rights' as well as feminism."
The Park Service HQ responded that they would edit the film to present a
"more balanced" version. The new film will include footage of rallies by
anti-abortion and Christian groups, such as the PromiseKeepers, and shots
of a pro-Gulf War demonstration. Neither of these events took place at the
Lincoln Memorial.
"The Park Service leadership now caters exclusively to conservative
Christian fundamentalist groups," says Jeff Ruch, director of Public
Employees for Environmental Responsibility. "The Bush administration
appears to be sponsoring a program of Faith-Based Parks."
What's next? Live reenactments of the witch trials at Salem National
Historical Park, presided over by John Ashcroft?
|