Backtalk
ETS! encourages comments, feedback, tips, corrections, and info! Please
keep them as concise as possible so we can print as many different voices
as possible: ETS!, P.O. Box 85541, Seattle WA 98145, or e-mail
ets@scn.org.
It's Here, It's Tainted, Get Used To It
ETS!,
I heard the piece on KEXP this last Saturday morning concerning
Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease. I am highly intrigued by your report as I have
recently had a friend die of the disease. I am surprised that I have not
heard any media reports on the numbers of human cases of the disease in the
US. My friend had not been out of the country for over 15 years and yet his
doctors say that he died from the disease. How can that happen? And why is
there not a national database of people who have died from it and a
follow-up of where they might have contracted it? It seems probable that he
came down with it while in the US. His obituary with the cause of death as
Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease was published in the Bremerton Sun newspaper.
I am deeply concerned that this disease may have been in our country for
quite some time. To my knowledge there has not been any investigation as to
the source of his disease. Can you investigate this scenario and report on
the outcome? I think this is an area of this disease that needs to be
explored.
Best Regards,
Katrina Satter, Seabeck WA
More Food!
ETS!,
Instead of toasting Catalonia's recent democratic advances away from the
salivating Spanish state, which has been trying for years to devour the
Catalans' sense of collective identity, Mr. Furlock serves up this shrill
and pro-state line: "Spain is literally breaking into pieces."
For a site called "Eat the State!," that article bites the big one.
Adam, via e-mail
The Church of Dennis Speaks
ETS!,
Kerry, Dean, Edwards, etc. are all corporate. That's why the corporate
media gives them play and they collect corporate $$.
Wide support of Kucinich would show Dems that they need to promote real
social justice to win. Dennis ain't a spoiler. He's the last vestige of
conscience for the Dems, and his goal is more conceptual than just winning
the presidency.
Marc Smason, Seattle
ETS!,
Again I hear it: "Kucinich. Of course he's wonderful. Too bad he's not
electable." And I don't believe my ears!
He is, was, and has been, "elected" 14 times! For 24 years voters sent the
message, "Do it again, Dennis." Each time, beginning at age 22 in the
Cleveland City Council, he squashed his Republican opponent.
Much of those 24 years, Kucinich has spent winning minds and hearts from
Cairo to Iceland. Why do you think the Dalai Lama and the Gandhi family
campaign beside him? He has every reason to state "I can stop this military
madness honorably."
The enormous costs of this military shame deleted, let's check Dennis's
domestic agenda: rewrite WTO and NAFTA; no more Sweetheart deals; demand
jobs with living wages; push alternative energy; a universal non-profit
medical plan that shrinks your bill to zero; the nation's (your taxes) down
75 per cent. It's the wish list of 99 per cent of the human race!!
Suddenly we understand why, in September 2002, the Republican dominated
newspaper ordered their reporters: "Don't mention the name Kucinich unless
you can connect it with something 'rotten'." Voters must not know Kucinich.
He is the one who can beat Bush.
Emily J. Horswill, Lynnwood WA
G.P. replies: I'm more with the first guy. Let's not even talk about
"electability," or paranoid urban-myth-style tales like Republican
newspaper conspiracies. (Hint: Kucinich would be getting far more coverage
this week if he hadn't, consistent with every poll, pulled a pitiful one
percent in Iowa--a Midwest farm state like Ohio, one with the same long
tradition of liberalism that produced Paul Wellstone in neighboring
Minnesota.)
Kucinich won't get the nomination. Period. Why? Because the process is
controlled by the Democratic Party leadership, not voters, and regardless
of voters' wishes (which show no sign of rallying behind either of them
anyway) the leadership is are not about to let either Kucinich or Al
Sharpton be their standard bearer. Ever. Any more than they were willing to
contemplate Jesse Jackson or Jerry Brown, two far more popular and
well-known politicians, in that role. That's a far more relevant barrier
than media coverage, where volume--if not tone--is predicated mostly on
polls and results.
I wish Kucinich supporters would stop harping on DK's "electability." It
makes you come off as delusional and inconsequential to folks outside the
church. Kucinich's value in this race is that he speaks the hearts and
minds of many, and is willing to say things and lay out detailed ideas none
of the other contestants will touch. His presence in the race speaks for
many people and forces other candidates to take stands on issues they'd
rather stay fuzzy on. That's good enough. Insisting that the sky is green
and the grass is purple only detracts from the legitimacy of what Kucinich
represents.
Humans From Earth
Dear Sirs,
I am a US taxpayer and I do think it is a good idea to spend money
exploring Mars--and all that surrounds our home planet. I think the current
robotic mission is certainly worth its $3.00 per person price tag.
There are monies available to spend on projects. The current
quagmire in Iraq is proof of that. I would rather see funds spent improving
the human condition than on greedy, shortsighted, or imperialistic
ventures. I think we should spend tax dollars for education, scientific
exploration, feeding and caring for the underprivileged, and the
environment. If these were our main focus, I doubt if there would be as
great a need for armies and warfare.
I think the people of our world could use a great project--one that offers
adventure and the advancement of our species. In an age when most
large-scale efforts amount to no more than squabbling over the few
remaining resources left on Earth, a project such as a mission to Mars
might be something in which we could take pride. We would be making the
first steps toward building the future of the human race. In fact, an
adventure such as the habitation of our sister planet might be considered
the beginning of human history. It is something to be embraced and
relished.
There have always been those who would hide from the future. They would
shun technology if they could--as if burying their heads in the sand like
an ostrich would somehow keep them safe. They might try to support their
fears by telling us there is nothing in space worth our efforts. They might
assure us with patriarchal statements like "While the Mars project may find
remnants of life, it will be nothing that couldn't be found in our own back
yard."
Staying on Earth is dangerous. If something should happen to our planet--an
asteroid impact, or a war gone out of control, for example--we might all
die. In our universe, all civilizations that do not move to other
planets will eventually become extinct. In the long run space is the
ultimate insurance policy for our species.
Perhaps, if we worked together on a great project, we could afford to spend
less on destruction and more on Human development.
--Kurt Rohrer, Seattle
T-Bone Burnett replies: We come from a blue planet light-years away / Where
everything multiplies at an amazing rate / We're out here in the universe
buying real estate / Hope we haven't gotten here too late
chorus: We're humans from earth / We're humans from earth / You have
nothing at all to fear / I think we're gonna like it here
We're looking for a planet with atmosphere / Where the air is fresh and the
water clear / With lots of sun like you have here / And three or four
hundred days a year
chorus
Bought Manhattan for a string of beads / Brought along some gadgets for you
to see / Here's a crazy little thing we call TV / Do you have electricity?
chorus
I know we may seem pretty strange to you / But we got know-how and a golden
rule / We're here to see Manifest Destiny through / Ain't nothing we can't
get used to
We're humans from earth / We're humans from earth...
|