Backtalk!
Reader Disapproves of Velazquez's Rhetoric
Dear Editor,
I have faith Seattle voters will ignore City Council candidate Venus
Velazquez's advice at the June 21st Hate Free Zone Candidates' Forum
(link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzEGpzGMgss). Ms. Velazquez
wants us to "look at" the candidates "and decide 'Are we the people
who look like you, who come from you? And if we're not, don't vote
for us.'"
By her admonition Ron Sims would not be King County Executive (under
six percent in King County are African-American), Gary Locke would
not have been Governor (under seven percent in the state are Asian),
we would be denied having a very qualified Maria Ramirez serve on the
Seattle School Board (under seven percent in Seattle are Latino), and
every office throughout the state would be held by Caucasians because
whites are by far the majority of voters. (Source: US Census Bureau,
2005 American Community Survey.)
The last time Ms. Velazquez made race an issue she aligned with the
other minority finalists for Jim Compton's vacated City Council
position, leaving Sally Clark out in the cold because Ms. Clark had
the misfortune of being white. (See Seattle Times "Sisterhood"
article 1/26/06.) Was that a hate free alliance?
Seattle voters have proved themselves above simply "looking" at
candidates. As it should be in a hate free zone, we judge candidates
on their qualifications and strength of character. We want elected
officials to look out for the best interests of everyone living in
Seattle, not just the interests of those that "look like" us. We are
a better city because we choose instead to examine the candidates'
values, work ethic, competency, and willingness to be a good public
servant.
--Pat Murakami, SE Seattle Activist, President of MCOM (Many
Cultures, One Message)
Crowley Memorial Irks Godden Campaign Manager
To Jeff Stevens and ETS! staff,
Regarding your article "Walt Crowley Will Have His Revenge on
Seattle". First, shame on you for using the tragic death of one of
Seattle's icons to advance your political agenda (i.e. the candidacy
of Joe Szwaja).
Second, get your facts straight. Walt Crowley was a big supporter,
and a dear friend, of Jean Godden and donated to her campaign for
reelection. I had the pleasure of meeting Walt for the first time at
Councilmember Godden's reelection kick-off. If there was one thing
Walt certainly did not want it was the election of Joe Szwaja. He was
a proud Godden backer.
I'm asking for a retraction or apology for your completely misleading
piece, but I'm not holding my breath.
Sincerely,
Carlo Davis, Manager of Campaign to Reelect Jean Godden (Seattle
City Council Pos. One)
PS--This is what a proper tribute to a great man looks like: http://
crosscut.com/history/7689/Jean+Godden%3A+Saying+goodbye+to+our+friend%
2C+Walt+Crowley/ Notice how Jean had the decency not to use his death
to advance her candidacy?
J.S. replies: Carlo, trust me, there's plenty of shame in this
town to go around-not to mention, apparently, disingenuousness.
First, regarding Walt Crowley's level of support for Jean Godden:
Crowley, being a fellow longtime local media icon, was understandably
an old friend of hers. But does this translate directly into avid
support for her candidacy and her agenda? It's noteworthy that the
only place Crowley's name appears on Godden's campaign website is in
the link to her eulogy to him. In other words, he's not listed there
as an endorser or a supporter.
As for his support for her agenda, please note here that the main
focus of my article was gentrification, and how it relates to
Crowley's role in Seattle's evolving definition of itself. So the
crucial question here seems to be: Did Walt Crowley support
gentrification in Seattle?
In that context, please also note carefully that nowhere in my
article did I dare speak in terms of what Crowley "would have wanted"
or "would have supported." I merely expressed my opinion that "[i]t
would be a truly fitting tribute to [Crowley's] memory" for a
genuinely and aggressively anti-gentrification candidate to join the
Seattle City Council, the better to preserve "much of the evidence of
[Seattle's] rich and gritty history that Crowley worked so hard for
so many years to document and publicize." Honestly, Carlo, between
Jean Godden and Joe Szwaja, which of the two current rivals for
Position No. 1 best meets that urgent qualification?
Allow me to quote here John Fox of the Seattle Displacement
Coalition, who has stated publicly that Godden has "consistently
voted against the interests of neighborhoods [and] low-income and
working people while routinely catering to the likes of Paul Allen,
downtown, and the corporate establishment." I'll quote as well the
Beacon Hill News/South District Journal, which recently said of
Godden, "there isn't a subsidy or a zoning change requested by Paul
Allen's Vulcan Inc. that she hasn't fully supported."
Also please note that my advocacy of Szwaja was merely part of one
paragraph in an article clearly devoted overall to praising-not
slandering-Crowley's life and work. In sum, and in my humble opinion,
perhaps you should reserve your shame for certain Seattle city
mothers and fathers who have recently laid down an increasingly wide
red carpet for developers, and therefore, gentrification.
Which leads to another question, of vintage lefty legend: Which side
are you on?
|