Volume 12, #3 October 11, 2007 POLITICS WITH BITE! CONTACT HELP previous BACK ISSUES next
A FORUM FOR ANTI-AUTHORITARIAN POLITICAL OPINION, RESEARCH AND HUMOR

Backtalk!



Reader Disapproves of Velazquez's Rhetoric

Dear Editor,

I have faith Seattle voters will ignore City Council candidate Venus Velazquez's advice at the June 21st Hate Free Zone Candidates' Forum (link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzEGpzGMgss). Ms. Velazquez wants us to "look at" the candidates "and decide 'Are we the people who look like you, who come from you? And if we're not, don't vote for us.'"

By her admonition Ron Sims would not be King County Executive (under six percent in King County are African-American), Gary Locke would not have been Governor (under seven percent in the state are Asian), we would be denied having a very qualified Maria Ramirez serve on the Seattle School Board (under seven percent in Seattle are Latino), and every office throughout the state would be held by Caucasians because whites are by far the majority of voters. (Source: US Census Bureau, 2005 American Community Survey.)

The last time Ms. Velazquez made race an issue she aligned with the other minority finalists for Jim Compton's vacated City Council position, leaving Sally Clark out in the cold because Ms. Clark had the misfortune of being white. (See Seattle Times "Sisterhood" article 1/26/06.) Was that a hate free alliance?

Seattle voters have proved themselves above simply "looking" at candidates. As it should be in a hate free zone, we judge candidates on their qualifications and strength of character. We want elected officials to look out for the best interests of everyone living in Seattle, not just the interests of those that "look like" us. We are a better city because we choose instead to examine the candidates' values, work ethic, competency, and willingness to be a good public servant.

--Pat Murakami, SE Seattle Activist, President of MCOM (Many Cultures, One Message)

Crowley Memorial Irks Godden Campaign Manager

To Jeff Stevens and ETS! staff,

Regarding your article "Walt Crowley Will Have His Revenge on Seattle". First, shame on you for using the tragic death of one of Seattle's icons to advance your political agenda (i.e. the candidacy of Joe Szwaja).

Second, get your facts straight. Walt Crowley was a big supporter, and a dear friend, of Jean Godden and donated to her campaign for reelection. I had the pleasure of meeting Walt for the first time at Councilmember Godden's reelection kick-off. If there was one thing Walt certainly did not want it was the election of Joe Szwaja. He was a proud Godden backer.

I'm asking for a retraction or apology for your completely misleading piece, but I'm not holding my breath.

Sincerely,

Carlo Davis, Manager of Campaign to Reelect Jean Godden (Seattle City Council Pos. One)

PS--This is what a proper tribute to a great man looks like: http:// crosscut.com/history/7689/Jean+Godden%3A+Saying+goodbye+to+our+friend% 2C+Walt+Crowley/ Notice how Jean had the decency not to use his death to advance her candidacy?

J.S. replies: Carlo, trust me, there's plenty of shame in this town to go around-not to mention, apparently, disingenuousness.

First, regarding Walt Crowley's level of support for Jean Godden: Crowley, being a fellow longtime local media icon, was understandably an old friend of hers. But does this translate directly into avid support for her candidacy and her agenda? It's noteworthy that the only place Crowley's name appears on Godden's campaign website is in the link to her eulogy to him. In other words, he's not listed there as an endorser or a supporter.

As for his support for her agenda, please note here that the main focus of my article was gentrification, and how it relates to Crowley's role in Seattle's evolving definition of itself. So the crucial question here seems to be: Did Walt Crowley support gentrification in Seattle?

In that context, please also note carefully that nowhere in my article did I dare speak in terms of what Crowley "would have wanted" or "would have supported." I merely expressed my opinion that "[i]t would be a truly fitting tribute to [Crowley's] memory" for a genuinely and aggressively anti-gentrification candidate to join the Seattle City Council, the better to preserve "much of the evidence of [Seattle's] rich and gritty history that Crowley worked so hard for so many years to document and publicize." Honestly, Carlo, between Jean Godden and Joe Szwaja, which of the two current rivals for Position No. 1 best meets that urgent qualification?

Allow me to quote here John Fox of the Seattle Displacement Coalition, who has stated publicly that Godden has "consistently voted against the interests of neighborhoods [and] low-income and working people while routinely catering to the likes of Paul Allen, downtown, and the corporate establishment." I'll quote as well the Beacon Hill News/South District Journal, which recently said of Godden, "there isn't a subsidy or a zoning change requested by Paul Allen's Vulcan Inc. that she hasn't fully supported."

Also please note that my advocacy of Szwaja was merely part of one paragraph in an article clearly devoted overall to praising-not slandering-Crowley's life and work. In sum, and in my humble opinion, perhaps you should reserve your shame for certain Seattle city mothers and fathers who have recently laid down an increasingly wide red carpet for developers, and therefore, gentrification.

Which leads to another question, of vintage lefty legend: Which side are you on?



subscribe / donate / tiny print / guidelines for writers / help / index

© 2007 Eat the State! All rights reserved.